Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jan 8, 2026
Date Accepted: Sep 24, 2026
Effects of Temporal Information Structure on Causal Explanations Generated by Large Language Models: Experimental Study Using Lung Cancer Incidence Data
ABSTRACT
Background:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to causal explanation in public health and epidemiology. However, recent studies suggest that LLMs exhibit instability in processing temporal information, which raises concerns about their suitability for generating coherent causal explanations. Despite this, little is known about how distinct components of temporal information influence LLM-generated causal explanations in epidemiological contexts.
Objective:
This study aimed to examine how event ordering and the validity and presence of explicit temporal information affect LLM-generated causal explanations of long-term lung cancer incidence trends. Specifically, we evaluated their effects on Evidence Grounding, Causal Alignment, and Disease Specificity.
Methods:
We used a 2 × 3 factorial design manipulating event ordering (Chronological vs Randomized) and explicit temporal information (Accurate, Inaccurate, or Absent). Five LLMs (GPT-5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Claude Opus 4.8, Qwen3-32B, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct) generated 600 causal explanations of long-term lung cancer incidence trends using SEER data and PubMed-derived event statements. The effects of Ordering and Information were assessed using regression and factorial analysis of variance.
Results:
Randomized ordering showed higher Evidence Grounding than Chronological ordering (aOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.89–3.37; p<0.001). Causal Alignment was higher under Chronological than Randomized ordering across all three Information conditions, with larger differences in the decreasing phase. Disease Specificity was higher under Randomized ordering only under Accurate information.
Conclusions:
More accurate or structured temporal information did not necessarily improve LLM-generated causal explanations. Randomized ordering was associated with greater evidence utilization, whereas chronological ordering supported causal alignment across all Information conditions, particularly for decreasing trajectories. These findings suggest that temporal context should be structured not only to provide temporal information but also to support the intended characteristics of the resulting explanation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.