Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Dec 17, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 6, 2026 - Mar 3, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

“To choose a band-aid” – a Q-methodology study of childrens' preferences for participation in healthcare situations

  • Merja Hietanen; 
  • Maksims Kornevs; 
  • Catarina Nahlén Bose; 
  • Jayanth Raghothama; 
  • Sebastiaan Meijer

ABSTRACT

Background:

Child-centered care (CCC) is standard practice in pediatrics, emphasizing the child as an individual with rights while acknowledging the child's role within the family. A key aspect of CCC is the involvement of the child in health care decisions alongside parents and professionals. Although this is a right recognized by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) it may not always be applied in practice.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to explore the preferences of 3- to 5-year-old children for participation in health care from both the child's perspective as well as the child perspective, i.e., to ask their parents and health professionals about their understanding of children's preferences.

Methods:

Preferences were studied using Q-methodology, comparing responses from twelve children, fourteen parents, and twelve health professionals who ranked twenty-five statements. Factor analysis identified shared perspectives on participation preferences. Children’s rankings were also analyzed separately for comparison.

Results:

Three perspectives presenting different preferences were identified: direct communication between the child and healthcare professionals; understanding and shared decision-making; and responsive and child-led participation. A separate analysis of children’s rankings resulted in three perspectives: included in and setting their own terms for participation; small choices, meaningful outcomes; and trust through familiarity and shared decision-making.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that children value shared decision-making and situational control but prefer to leave major decisions to adults. It affirms that pre-school-aged children can meaningfully participate in healthcare when given age-appropriate choices, support, and tools. Children’s perspectives must be acknowledged directly rather than adults assuming their views. The findings support child-centered care (CCC) principles and reinforce the UNCRC mandate to respect children’s views regarding all issues relevant to them.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hietanen M, Kornevs M, Nahlén Bose C, Raghothama J, Meijer S

“To choose a band-aid” – a Q-methodology study of childrens' preferences for participation in healthcare situations

JMIR Preprints. 17/12/2025:89802

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.89802

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/89802

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.