Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Dec 16, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 19, 2026 - Mar 4, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Digital Assistive System for Maintaining Nutrition and Mobility in Older Adults: Usability and Feasibility Findings from a Pilot Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Due to demographic change the number of older people is increasing. Older age is often accompanied by limitations in terms of mobility, nutrition and independence. Routine, preventive monitoring of these areas is rare, as care systems struggle with staff shortages and limited resources. Technical assistance systems offer a way to support older people (≥70 years) in self-assessing their health parameters and in consequence keep independence. We developed the AS-Tra system which combines an app with a measurement and training station (MuTS) to identify deficits and risks in the areas of nutrition and mobility in older adults at an early stage.
Objective:
This paper presents the pilot study of the AS-Tra system with the aim of evaluating its usability and testing the feasibility of collecting health-related data of older adults (70+) with early / mild deficiencies in nutritional state and physical functionality in preparation for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Methods:
The system was developed as a complex intervention in accordance with the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. In this pilot study, the participants used the system four weeks. The assessments (grip strength, Timed ‘Up and Go’, 5-Time Chair Rise) were conducted at the baseline (BL) as well as after one, two and four weeks (T0, T1, T2). At BL, inclusion criteria, baseline characteristics, MNA-SF and SPPB were recorded. Participants received a tablet containing the app and an activity sensor to measure physical activity for seven days. At T0, next to the assessments, the training exercises were introduced and carried out. At T1 the assessments were repeated, along with registering a 3-day food diary in the tablet app and the activity sensor data was evaluated. At T2, the final assessments, including MNA-SF, SPPB, SUS, and feedback questionnaires as well as the ‘Evaluation Overall System’-questionnaire (EOS) (evaluation of all subcomponents on a scale of 1 to 5) were collected. Throughout the entire period of use, participants were asked to train independently in MuTS at least once a week. They regularly kept a food diary using the tablet app and were asked to provide feedback on the app and MuTS in form of an ‘Experience Report’-questionnaire (ER), in which it is asked which elements caused problems and which were particularly easy.
Results:
Ten participants (80 ± 5 years, 50% female) participated in this study, of which one droped-out between T0 and T1. The SUS score was good (79 ± 13.4). The MuTS devices had minor technical problems (in <17% of the usage) according to the ER, while 57% of the users experienced instability issues with the food diary in the tablet app. Overall, ratings of the system were very good with good with slightly lower ratings (2–3 out of 5) for the tablet app and regular use.
Conclusions:
The usability of the technical assistance system used in this study was rated as good. The data collection with questionnaires, sensors, and automated assessments proved feasible. The biggest challenge was the tablet-based food diary which still needs improvement, before the effectiveness of the AS-Tra system regarding mobility and nutritional status will be evaluated in a RCT.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.