Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Dec 9, 2025
Date Accepted: May 20, 2026
Policy considerations for national virtual hospitals: global evidence and the Seha Virtual Hospital model
ABSTRACT
This ViewPoint examines national virtual hospitals as health-system policy innovations responding to rising pressure on inpatient services driven by population aging, multimorbidity, and emergency admissions. Global evidence across tele–intensive care unit (tele-ICU), hospital-at-home, virtual-ward, and telestroke models indicates that outcomes are mixed and highly dependent on patient selection, infrastructure maturity, workforce capacity, governance, and digital equity. Saudi Arabia’s Seha Virtual Hospital is examined as a national-scale case study of virtual hospital deployment, demonstrating large-scale operational feasibility and rapid service expansion, yet with limited independent evidence on comparative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, workforce impact, and equity outcomes. National virtual hospitals are best framed not as established solutions but as evidence-generating policy experiments. Successful scale-up depends on embedding rigorous evaluation alongside implementation, with explicit assessment of clinical outcomes, economic sustainability, digital inclusion, and workforce well-being. This ViewPoint outlines key policy and evaluation principles to guide governments and health-system leaders in the safe, equitable, and sustainable deployment of national virtual hospital programs.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.