Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Dec 2, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 14, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Accuracy, Reliability, and Quality of YouTube and TikTok Videos as Sources of Information on Urticaria: Cross-Sectional Study

Bukhari A, Altalhab S, AlFaraj S, Alrwebah H, Alrubaiaan M, Alfawzan A

Accuracy, Reliability, and Quality of YouTube and TikTok Videos as Sources of Information on Urticaria: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e88827

DOI: 10.2196/88827

PMID: 43002694

Accuracy, Reliability, and Quality of YouTube and TikTok Videos as Sources of Information on Urticaria: Cross-Sectional Study

  • Abrar Bukhari; 
  • Saad Altalhab; 
  • Suliman AlFaraj; 
  • Huda Alrwebah; 
  • Mishari Alrubaiaan; 
  • Abdulrahman Alfawzan

ABSTRACT

Background:

The era of social media platforms has transformed the dissemination of health information, raising concerns about the quality and accuracy of content. Urticaria, a common skin condition, necessitates reliable information for effective management.

Objective:

This study aims to systematically evaluate urticaria-related content on two prominent social media platforms, YouTube and TikTok, utilizing validated tools to assess information reliability and explore the characteristics of videos and their uploaders.

Methods:

On February 16, 2023, a comprehensive search on YouTube and TikTok was conducted for videos related to urticaria. Two independent dermatologists rated 92 eligible videos using DISCERN, GQS, and ANDI. Statistical analyses, including mean values, standard deviations, percentages, and chi-square tests, were employed to interpret the data.

Results:

TikTok videos were predominantly uploaded by patients (63%), whereas YouTube exhibited a higher engagement of healthcare professionals (67.4%). Healthcare professional uploaders on TikTok and YouTube demonstrated significantly higher mean scores in DISCERN, GQS, and ANDI (p < 0.001). The study offers insights into the nuanced dynamics shaping urticaria-related content on these platforms.

Conclusions:

Urticaria videos in TikTok showed a significantly higher engagement ratio and less accuracy and quality of health-related information than YouTube videos. These insights can guide content creators, platform administrators, and healthcare professionals in collaboratively fostering a trustworthy and accurate health information environment on social media. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bukhari A, Altalhab S, AlFaraj S, Alrwebah H, Alrubaiaan M, Alfawzan A

Accuracy, Reliability, and Quality of YouTube and TikTok Videos as Sources of Information on Urticaria: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Dermatol 2026;9:e88827

DOI: 10.2196/88827

PMID: 43002694

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.