Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Nov 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 8, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Navigation System–Assisted vs Freehand Cannulated Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Li M, Tong D, Cheng M, Li J, Ji F, Zhang W

Navigation System–Assisted vs Freehand Cannulated Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e88180

DOI: 10.2196/88180

PMID: 42335459

A Novel Navigation System Versus Freehand Technique for Femoral Neck Fracture Cannulated Screw Fixation: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Meng Li; 
  • Dake Tong; 
  • Meng Cheng; 
  • Jiantao Li; 
  • Fang Ji; 
  • Wei Zhang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The incidence of femoral neck fractures is increasing, primarily due to an aging population and a higher occurrence of high-energy trauma. Although fixation with three cannulated screws (TCS) is the most commonly used surgical technique, it presents limitations, including suboptimal operative accuracy and dependence on repeated intraoperative fluoroscopy. In response, advanced navigation systems have been developed to improve surgical precision and outcomes, thereby justifying further comparative research.

Objective:

This multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel navigation system-assisted fixation for femoral neck fractures.

Methods:

This multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial will compare navigation system-assisted cannulated screw fixation (NS+TCS) against conventional freehand TCS fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures. The primary outcome is the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy. Secondary outcomes include: (1) measurement of neck-shaft angle postoperatively, (2) assessment of the quality of guidewire placement, (3) recording of operative time, (4) quantification of intraoperative blood loss, (5) evaluation of fracture healing status through imaging, and (6) assessment of patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life using the Harris Hip Score, SF-36, and Zarit Caregiver Burden Score. All patients will undergo a follow-up period of 12 months.

Results:

The study aims to enroll 300 participants from June 2024 to October 2026. This study received initial ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the coordinating center, Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2024-341-01), and is carried out as a multicenter investigation. Each collaborating site is required to secure approval from its local ethics committee prior to enrolling participants in the respective controlled cohort studies. yet. Data analysis will be performed after data collection ends, and results will be published afterward.

Conclusions:

The successful completion of this study will introduce a new strategy and establish a standardized protocol for using navigation systems in managing these fractures. Clinical Trial: This study was prospectively registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06713018).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li M, Tong D, Cheng M, Li J, Ji F, Zhang W

Navigation System–Assisted vs Freehand Cannulated Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e88180

DOI: 10.2196/88180

PMID: 42335459

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.