Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Nov 14, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 17, 2025 - Jan 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Formative Analysis of Emotion, Temporality, and Culture in Women's Health Forums: Informing the Design of Responsive Sociotechnical Systems
ABSTRACT
Background:
Stigmatized women's health issues, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis, are often marginalized or dismissed in traditional clinical settings. This drives individuals to seek peer support in anonymous online communities like Reddit. While these digital platforms host critical discussions, they are often designed as static information repositories, failing to account for the complex emotional, temporal, and cultural dynamics that shape users' support needs. There is a disconnect between the lived experiences of users—particularly feelings of clinical dismissal and the need for culturally-specific advice—and the design of the sociotechnical systems they rely on.
Objective:
This study aimed to deconstruct support practices in online women's health forums to provide a formative basis for designing more responsive digital health systems. We analyzed the intersections of discussion topics, emotional expression, temporal shifts (specifically the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic), and culturally-situated discourse to identify unmet user needs and effective peer-support patterns.
Methods:
We conducted a large-scale, mixed-methods analysis of 4,995 posts and 460,317 comments from five major women's health subreddits (r/WomensHealth, r/TwoXChromosomes, r/BirthControl, r/Endometriosis, and r/PCOS). Computational methods included Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modeling, VADER for sentiment analysis, and the NRC Emotion Lexicon for granular emotion classification. We segmented the data into pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 periods to analyze temporal shifts. This quantitative analysis was complemented by a two-phase qualitative thematic analysis to identify and characterize engagement patterns within 147 validated culturally-situated threads.
Results:
Our analysis revealed that the most prevalent and emotionally negative topic was "Pain & Doctor Visits," which was uniquely characterized by high levels of fear and sadness linked to systemic clinical dismissal. The COVID-19 pandemic triggered a significant topical "turn inward," with discussions shifting away from social/political issues and toward somatic concerns (e.g., "PCOS," "Pain & Doctor Visits"). Paradoxically, this period saw a simultaneous rise in both negative emotions (eg, fear, sadness) and expressions of community trust. Critically, our qualitative analysis of culturally-situated discourse uncovered a consistent three-stage "playbook" for effective support: (1) Affirmation, to establish psychological safety and validate cultural experiences; (2) Information Scaffolding, to provide actionable, culturally-tailored advice; and (3) Inter-Cultural Bridging, to facilitate community-wide learning and empathy.
Conclusions:
Online health forums operate as essential, resilient sociotechnical infrastructures that actively compensate for failures and gaps in formal healthcare. The "Affirmation-Scaffolding-Bridging" model identified in our research provides a clear, formative framework for designing future digital health interventions. These findings can guide the development of new platforms that are emotionally aware, culturally responsive, and adaptive to user needs and external crises.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.