Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Nov 10, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 10, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Exploring the Feasibility of a Neck-Mounted Wearable Camera for OSCE Assessment: A Pilot Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a prevalent method for evaluating clinical competence in medical education. As OSCEs become increasingly standardized and resource-intensive, alternative evaluation methods are being explored, particularly owing to the limited availability of certified examiners. However, few studies have investigated whether wearable technologies can effectively support OSCE assessment. Wearable devices may present a viable solution for recording and assessing clinical skills from the examiner’s perspective.
Objective:
This pilot study, conducted in 2024, aimed to investigate the feasibility and utility of a neck-mounted wearable camera for recording OSCE scenarios and to evaluate the assessability of clinical performance based on the obtained footage.
Methods:
Nine experienced medical educators participated in a simulated OSCE scenario involving ECG lead placement. All participants completed the initial live assessment and post-use questionnaire, while 8 completed the subsequent video-based reassessment. The authors utilized video recordings from both a fixed camera and a neck-mounted camera (THINKLET®) to assess the evaluability of each OSCE item. Following a washout period, evaluators re-assessed the recorded sessions. The authors analyzed interrater agreement using percent agreement and Cohen’s κ coefficient. A post-evaluation questionnaire captured evaluators’ experiences with the wearable device.
Results:
Cohen’s κ ranged from 0.258 to 0.913 (mean: 0.67), indicating substantial overall agreement. Visibility of fine motor skills, particularly in ECG electrode placement, appeared to be enhanced when using the neck-mounted camera, as inferred from higher assessment completion rates compared to fixed-camera recordings (odds ratio = 11.69; P < .001). Evaluators reported generally positive experiences with the device, although some noted issues with comfort, posture restriction, and limited visibility at low angles.
Conclusions:
This pilot study suggested that neck-mounted wearable cameras may enhance flexibility and visual accuracy in OSCE assessment, supporting their potential role in supplementing current evaluation practices. Further research is needed to standardize usage and address technical challenges.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.