Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 4, 2025 - Dec 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 9, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Validity and Reliability of the Track-UL Algorithm Compared With Kinovea Software for Measuring Upper-Limb Functional Range of Motion in People After Stroke: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Lazem H, Harris D, Hall A, Richards TC, Leveridge P, Mansoubi M, Xu X, Newell P, Lamb SE, Dawes H

Validity and Reliability of the Track-UL Algorithm Compared With Kinovea Software for Measuring Upper-Limb Functional Range of Motion in People After Stroke: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e87128

DOI: 10.2196/87128

PMID: 42114045

Validity and Reliability of the Track-UL Algorithm Compared with Kinovea for Measuring Upper Limb Functional Range of Motion in People After Stroke

  • Hatem Lazem; 
  • David Harris; 
  • Abi Hall; 
  • Thomas C Richards; 
  • Phaedra Leveridge; 
  • Maedeh Mansoubi; 
  • Xiaohan Xu; 
  • Paul Newell; 
  • Sarah E Lamb; 
  • Helen Dawes

ABSTRACT

Background:

Around 70% of stroke survivors have problems with arm function. Physiotherapists assess arm functional range of motion (ROM) either with a goniometer or functional questionnaires, which lack objective accuracy and require a skilled physiotherapist. We developed the Track-UL algorithm based on a markerless motion capture system to measure arm ROM.

Objective:

This study aimed to measure the agreement between our novel Track-UL algorithm and Kinovea in assessing arm ROM during functional tasks in the lab and home settings.

Methods:

Videos were recorded while 27 chronic stroke survivors performed four functional tasks (e.g. forward reaching) in the lab and at home. Videos were analysed by two independent raters using the Track-UL algorithm and Kinovea. Limit of Agreement (LoA) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated.

Results:

We found no clinically significant systematic bias in shoulder and elbow angle, with good agreement between the Track-UL and Kinovea (assessed by Bland-Altman plots). The 95%LoA = -3.18 to 6.41 degrees for the shoulder joint, -5.35 to 8.78 degrees for the elbow joint in the lab, and -6.21 to 3.62 degrees for the shoulder joint, -4.06 to 2.53 degrees for the elbow joint at home. There was excellent absolute agreement between the measurement tools across all tasks and joints; ICC = 0.97 to 0.99; p < 0.001 for both lab and home measurements.

Conclusions:

The novel Track-UL algorithm is an accurate, valid, and easy tool that can be used to assess upper limb ROM in stroke survivors at clinics and potentially at home. This will support physiotherapists to remotely monitor and adapt rehabilitation programs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lazem H, Harris D, Hall A, Richards TC, Leveridge P, Mansoubi M, Xu X, Newell P, Lamb SE, Dawes H

Validity and Reliability of the Track-UL Algorithm Compared With Kinovea Software for Measuring Upper-Limb Functional Range of Motion in People After Stroke: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e87128

DOI: 10.2196/87128

PMID: 42114045

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.