Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Nov 3, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 4, 2025 - Dec 30, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Virtual Integrated GP-Paediatrician Model of Care in Metropolitan and Rural Australia: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Perspectives on the SUSTAIN Model of Care.
ABSTRACT
Background:
General Practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in a patient’s health care journey. However, demands on general practice, including an aging population and complex patient management, workforce shortages and health system fragmentation, have been shown to adversely impact delivery of high-quality care and health outcomes. Integrated care models, particularly those that offer virtual care options, are one way to support improved access to quality care and efficiency of health care delivery across metropolitan and rural areas. The SUSTAIN model of care was created to provide an accessible option for integrated care. It consists of centralised paediatricians supporting general practitioners in their practice through virtual co-consultations, virtual case discussions and phone/email support. There is limited evaluation literature on integrated models of care being implemented in a primary care setting where the GP and family are face-to-face and the non-GP specialist is virtual. To address this gap, a comprehensive implementation evaluation of the SUSTAIN model of care was conducted.
Objective:
To examine what, why and how different factors impact the uptake of the SUSTAIN model of care from the perspectives of the SUSTAIN paediatricians and metropolitan and rural GPs in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Methods:
Qualitative study as part of the mixed-methods implementation evaluation of the SUSTAIN model of care. Data were collected via recorded online focus groups and interviews with general practitioners, general practice managers and paediatricians at 6- and 12-months post implementation of SUSTAIN. Data were analysed thematically using iterative thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research.
Results:
Eighteen focus groups and 13 interviews were conducted. GPs, practice managers and paediatricians found the SUSTAIN model acceptable, with the flexibility and practicality of the model highlighted. GPs valued the learning opportunities, collaboration and support they gained working alongside the paediatricians. Virtual delivery through telehealth was viewed as a positive means of receiving specialist support that would otherwise be inaccessible to many practices. Increased efficiency in workflow and working at the top of scope in paediatric care as well as opportunities for meaningful professional relationships and increased family trust in GP-delivered care were recognised as key benefits that enhanced uptake. The current landscape of Australian general practice, with fee-for-service billing, limited time and workflow pressures, were all recognised as barriers to engagement with the SUSTAIN model of care. GPs and paediatricians recognised the need for more appropriate remuneration to support co-consultation as vital to the sustainability and scalability of the SUSTAIN model.
Conclusions:
The SUSTAIN model of care expands on our understanding of the benefits of integrated GP-paediatrician models of care in general practice by demonstrating the utility of a paediatrician supporting a GP in their practice via telehealth across metropolitan and rural environments in NSW, Australia. Clinical Trial: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000543684
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.