Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 8, 2026
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 9, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Frontline Health Workers’ Responses to Patient Inquiries With and Without Large Language Model Support in Nigeria: Observational Study

Moosa M, Malumi O, Chinedu S, Okah W, Ogboye A, Abiakam C, Duys T, Lagos KJ, Etuk I, Mobisson N

Evaluating Frontline Health Workers’ Responses to Patient Inquiries With and Without Large Language Model Support in Nigeria: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e86578

DOI: 10.2196/86578

PMID: 42715602

Evaluating Frontline Health Workers’ Responses to Patient Inquiries With and Without Large Language Model Support in Nigeria: Observational Study

  • Maria Moosa; 
  • Oluwaseyi Malumi; 
  • Solomon Chinedu; 
  • Wilson Okah; 
  • Ayoposi Ogboye; 
  • Chiagozie Abiakam; 
  • Thameshree Duys; 
  • Khushi Jain Lagos; 
  • Imo Etuk; 
  • Nneka Mobisson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Frontline health workers (FLWs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often face barriers that compromise care quality, including limited training, high patient loads, inadequate access to updated clinical guidance, and resource constraints. Working in underserved settings further exacerbates challenges to providing accurate, complete, and empathetic responses. Addressing these gaps requires innovative tools to support FLWs in real time.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in enhancing the quality of FLWs’ responses to health inquiries in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods:

In this observational study, 36 licensed FLWs (doctors, nurses, community health workers) practicing general or primary care in Lagos, Nigeria, generated responses to 15 patient-generated health questions covering maternal and neonatal health, family planning, and sexually transmitted infections. Each FLW produced responses using their own knowledge and available resources (“human-only”) and with ChatGPT-3·5 assistance (“GPT-aided”). A panel of clinicians evaluated responses using a 5-point Likert scale for accuracy, empathy, contextualization, completeness, safety, and overall preference. In addition, 8 non-clinician health seekers assessed a subset of responses for trustworthiness, clarity, and perceived quality of care.

Results:

Across 1080 responses from 36 FLWs, ChatGPT-aided responses significantly outperformed human-only responses on all clinician-rated metrics (P<.001), with the largest gains in completeness, empathy, and overall preference - particularly among non-physician FLWs. Non-clinician evaluators also preferred ChatGPT-aided responses, especially for trustworthiness. The findings highlight LLMs' potential to improve the quality, empathy, and trustworthiness of FLWs’ responses, particularly in low-resource settings. There is a need to explore the safe integration of LLMs into clinical workflows, alongside capacity-building and further evaluation to ensure effectiveness, equity, and patient safety.

Conclusions:

This study provides empirical evidence that a large language model enhances the accuracy, empathy, and perceived trustworthiness of responses by frontline health workers in Lagos, Nigeria. These findings underscore the potential of LLM integration to strengthen healthcare delivery in resource-limited settings, highlighting the necessity for further investigation into its safe, equitable, and effective implementation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Moosa M, Malumi O, Chinedu S, Okah W, Ogboye A, Abiakam C, Duys T, Lagos KJ, Etuk I, Mobisson N

Evaluating Frontline Health Workers’ Responses to Patient Inquiries With and Without Large Language Model Support in Nigeria: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e86578

DOI: 10.2196/86578

PMID: 42715602

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.