Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 29, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Strengthening Health Care Professionals’ Collaborative Responses to Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: Protocol for an Exploratory Mixed Methods Study

Jones C, Lovell B, Humphrey T, Brown A

Strengthening Health Care Professionals’ Collaborative Responses to Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: Protocol for an Exploratory Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e86289

DOI: 10.2196/86289

PMID: 41875241

Strengthening Healthcare Professionals Collaborative Responses to Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Research Protocol

  • Carly Jones; 
  • Belinda Lovell; 
  • Tracy Humphrey; 
  • Angela Brown

ABSTRACT

Background:

Effective collaborative practice among healthcare professionals is crucial for addressing intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy and therefore the development and evaluation of an evidence-based intervention for healthcare professionals is required to work towards meeting the key priorities of the National Plan to End Violence Against Women and Children 2022-2032. The consistency, modality and effectiveness of IPV focused education varies and some midwives lack the confidence to respond effectively to disclosures, often due to limited knowledge and skills. This issue is further amplified in interdisciplinary settings, where a lack of cohesiveness and collaboration can negatively impact the experience for pregnant women seeking or needing support.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to design, implement, and evaluate an evidence-informed, simulation-based, interprofessional education intervention to improve healthcare professionals’ collaborative response to intimate partner violence disclosures during the perinatal period in the South Australian maternity healthcare sector.

Methods:

This study adopts a pragmatic approach. An exploratory mixed methods research design will be used comprising of three phases: exploration, development and evaluation. Qualitative data will be collected first from interviews and focus groups. The qualitative data will inform the development of the educational program, whereby the effectiveness of the intervention in improving collaborative practice, including values and ethics, roles and responsibilities, communication, and teams and teamwork as defined by the IPEC competency standards, will be evaluated using quantitative survey data collected before and after implementation.

Results:

This study will employ both qualitative and quantitative methods to inform the design and evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation-based interprofessional workshop for health professionals.

Conclusions:

Simulation-based learning experiences are an effective teaching approach, as they enable healthcare professionals to apply theoretical knowledge in a controlled, practical environment. While IPV-focused curricula exist, this study aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of educational interventions designed to enhance collaboration within interdisciplinary teams in the context of IPV. Clinical Trial: not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jones C, Lovell B, Humphrey T, Brown A

Strengthening Health Care Professionals’ Collaborative Responses to Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: Protocol for an Exploratory Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e86289

DOI: 10.2196/86289

PMID: 41875241

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.