Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 13, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 7, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring Vaping Cessation App Use Among Youth: Qualitative Descriptive Study

Fonteyne K, Taylor M, Nawara R, Rodberg D, Afshar T, Struik L

Exploring Vaping Cessation App Use Among Youth: Qualitative Descriptive Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e85778

DOI: 10.2196/85778

PMID: 42247467

Exploring Vaping Cessation App Use among Youth: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

  • Karlee Fonteyne; 
  • Mischa Taylor; 
  • Roula Nawara; 
  • Danielle Rodberg; 
  • Tina Afshar; 
  • Laura Struik

ABSTRACT

Background:

Youth vaping has become a significant public health concern, with high rates of initiation, nicotine dependence and misperceptions of harm. Although many youth attempt to quit, most do so without formal support, and few report leveraging cessation apps. Mobile health tools have potential as accessible youth-orientated supports, yet little is known about youth experiences with these interventions.

Objective:

This study explored Canadian youth’s perceptions and experiences of vaping cessation mobile applications, focusing on preferences, perceived utility and recommendations for improvement.

Methods:

A Qualitative Descriptive design guided by a constructivist paradigm was employed. Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with youth aged 16-24 years from British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec in fall 2022. Eligible participants had current or past vaping experience, had attempted or wanted to quit, and had used a cessation app. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively using Reflexive Thematic Analysis, with reflexivity supported through team-based coding and iterative discussions.

Results:

Three themes described youth’s experiences. Quitting on my Own Terms reflected the importance of autonomy and intrinsic motivation, with varied views as to where app use conflicted with or supported independent cessation. Parallel Experiences- Differing Views on Community, captured ambivalence toward in-app social features: while some valued peer support, others preferred to quit privately or used broader online platforms. Pocket-sized Partners in Cessation highlighted the usefulness of features such as progress tracking, motivational reinforcement and gamification but participants stressed that convenience also was not enough. Youth emphasized the need for apps that feel authentic, emotionally resonate, and capable of balancing independence with opportunities for connection.

Conclusions:

Youth want cessation apps that function as pocket-sized partners rather than passive trackers. Effective interventions should validate autonomy, account for non-linear cessation journeys and relapses, and integrate supportive, interactive, and youth-friendly features. By addressing equity, sustainability, and integration into broader public health systems, digital cessation tools may better support youth in their quitting journeys.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fonteyne K, Taylor M, Nawara R, Rodberg D, Afshar T, Struik L

Exploring Vaping Cessation App Use Among Youth: Qualitative Descriptive Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e85778

DOI: 10.2196/85778

PMID: 42247467

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.