Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 9, 2025
Date Accepted: May 11, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Technology-Enhanced Peer Support for Depression in Older Adults: Single-Arm Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

Joo Jh, Xie A, Van Vleet S, Locascio J, Brackpool K, Wu F, Choi N, Solomon P

Technology-Enhanced Peer Support for Depression in Older Adults: Single-Arm Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e85526

DOI: 10.2196/85526

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Feasibility of a peer support intervention using video chats and texting for older adults with depression

  • Jin hui Joo; 
  • Alice Xie; 
  • Samuel Van Vleet; 
  • Joseph Locascio; 
  • Kristina Brackpool; 
  • Fei Wu; 
  • Namkee Choi; 
  • Phyllis Solomon

ABSTRACT

Background:

Depression in later life is often compounded by social isolation and barriers to care. There is limited study of technology-enhanced peer support for depression among older adults.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a technology-enhanced peer support intervention to decrease depression among older adults.

Methods:

We used a mixed-methods pilot study among adults aged 50 years and older with depression who received a peer support intervention called Peers+. The intervention consisted of 8 weekly video chats and unidirectional texts focused on increasing depression self-care and coping. Data obtained from screening, baseline, post-intervention and 3 months follow up were used in the analysis to assess preliminary outcomes of intervention. Mixed effects longitudinal models were used to assess change in depression, and qualitative data was analyzed to identify key themes related to participant experiences.

Results:

Thirty-four older adults with a mean age of 67 participated in the study, and 82.4 % of participants finished all 8 intervention meetings. Depressive symptoms declined over the course of the study of 35 weeks [F(1, 88.8) = 26.0, β = -0.14, 95% CI [-0.20, -0.09], p < .0001]. Emotional well-being (β = 0.48, 95% CI [0.26, 0.70], p < .0001), social functioning (β = 0.71, 95% CI [0.33,1.09], p = .0004), self-efficacy (β = 2.29, 95% CI [0.83, 3.75], p = .0028) and coping (β = 2.90, 95% CI [0.24, 5.55], p = .0330) improved throughout the study period. Participants perceived supportive texts as reinforcing trust between peer coaches, use of coping strategies, increasing social connection, and providing accountability for improving self-care. Peer coaches and older adults needed technology support for participation in the study.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a peer support intervention enhanced by video chats and texts, delivered by older adult peer coaches to an ethnically diverse group of older adults with depression. Study findings indicate that ongoing and accessible technology support contributed to older adult participation and engagement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Joo Jh, Xie A, Van Vleet S, Locascio J, Brackpool K, Wu F, Choi N, Solomon P

Technology-Enhanced Peer Support for Depression in Older Adults: Single-Arm Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e85526

DOI: 10.2196/85526

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.