Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 7, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 8, 2025 - Dec 3, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 9, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities

Yu Z, Mulholland A, Huang T, Liu Q

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e85414

DOI: 10.2196/85414

PMID: 41883140

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Datasets, Models and Modalities

  • Ziwen Yu; 
  • Anthony Mulholland; 
  • Tianyan Huang; 
  • Qiang Liu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a major global health challenge, characterised by progressive cognitive decline and rising prevalence due to population ageing. Despite increased awareness, a substantial diagnostic gap remains, underscoring the urgent need for scalable and accurate early detection methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides a promising solution by integrating multimodal data to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. However, current research remains fragmented, with studies often focusing separately on clinical phenotyping or linguistic-based cognitive impairment data.

Objective:

This review aims to systematically synthesise recent advances in multimodal AI approaches for AD diagnosis and risk prediction, bridging the gap between clinical phenotyping and linguistic-based cognitive assessment research.

Methods:

Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across major databases to identify studies published in the past five years that applied multimodal AI models for AD diagnosis or cognitive impairment detection. A total of 97 eligible studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Extracted data covered modality combinations, AI modelling strategies, evaluation metrics, and dataset usage.

Results:

Multimodal AI models consistently outperformed single-modality approaches in diagnostic accuracy and generalisability. Deep learning and ensemble learning frameworks were the most frequently adopted methods, offering strong feature-fusion capabilities. However, methodological heterogeneity, data imbalance, and limited dataset accessibility were recurring challenges. The review further summarises representative modality pairings such as imaging + clinical, imaging + genetic, and speech + cognitive features and provides an overview of publicly available multimodal datasets to facilitate reproducibility and benchmarking.

Conclusions:

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of multimodal AI models for AD diagnosis, uniquely integrating both clinical phenotyping and linguistic-based cognitive assessment perspectives. It highlights key methodological trends, dataset limitations, and opportunities for future research toward standardised, interpretable, and generalisable AI-driven diagnostic frameworks for Alzheimer’s disease.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yu Z, Mulholland A, Huang T, Liu Q

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e85414

DOI: 10.2196/85414

PMID: 41883140

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.