Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Online Journal of Public Health Informatics

Date Submitted: Sep 28, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 28, 2025 - Nov 23, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 18, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automating Diagnosis of Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases via Patient Metadata through Machine Learning Model with Adaptive Balancing and Dual Cross-Validation: Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Yohannes Minyilu G, Yimer MA, Meshesha M

Automating Diagnosis of Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases via Patient Metadata through Machine Learning Model with Adaptive Balancing and Dual Cross-Validation: Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Online J Public Health Inform 2026;18:e84966

DOI: 10.2196/84966

PMID: 42628011

Automating Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases Diagnosis via Patient Metadata: Pilot Study Benchmarking Robust Machine Learning Pipeline through Synchronized Class Balancing and Dual Cross Validation

  • G. Yohannes Minyilu; 
  • Mohammed Abebe Yimer; 
  • Million Meshesha

ABSTRACT

Background:

Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases (skin NTDs) are the most prevalent diseases worldwide, affecting people living in resource-limited areas with low healthcare services and trained professionals. While machine learning (ML)-based diagnostic tools can be used for initial clinical assessment and patient screening, especially in resource-limited areas (including in Ethiopia), little efforts have been done in the area.

Objective:

This study, thus, proposes a skin NTDs classification model using clinical patient metadata.

Methods:

NTDs diagnostic data, collected from the affected areas in the Southwest of Ethiopia, is acquired and used in this study. The initial dataset (IDS), and 3 additional versions created by applying manual preprocessing, random oversampling, and SMOTE methods on IDS are used to train 8 selected models, comparatively analyze performances, and finally identify the best-performing model. The model trainings on the newly created datasets have led the models to overfit, given the smaller size of the dataset.

Results:

While the hold-out method on all forms of the dataset leads to overfitting, the use of K-fold method on IDS allowed the models to achieve reliable results, with SVM (linear) outperforming the other models with overall accuracy of 76.92% and balanced accuracy 58.87%, followed by random forest (RF) with 74.25% and 54.73%. Comparatively, the RF model performs consistently higher across all trainings, hence, identified as the best-performing model, as it achieves 76.25%, 59.75%, 0.64, 0.70 in overall accuracy, balanced accuracy, F1-score, and G-mean, respectively after hyperparameter tuning.

Conclusions:

Overall, this study has been highly challenged by data scarcity and class imbalances, hence, suggests future studies to confirm the results on larger datasets having all the classes of the skin NTDs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yohannes Minyilu G, Yimer MA, Meshesha M

Automating Diagnosis of Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases via Patient Metadata through Machine Learning Model with Adaptive Balancing and Dual Cross-Validation: Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Online J Public Health Inform 2026;18:e84966

DOI: 10.2196/84966

PMID: 42628011

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.