Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 16, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 26, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Remote Vital Sign Monitoring in Acutely Unwell Hospital at Home Patients: Nonrandomized Feasibility Study

Greer RC, Roman C, Shi M, Gooch B, Lawson B, Biggs C, Edwards C, Vollam S, Watkinson P, Tarassenko L, Farmer A, Lasserson D

Remote Vital Sign Monitoring in Acutely Unwell Hospital at Home Patients: Nonrandomized Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e84233

DOI: 10.2196/84233

PMID: 42789931

Remote Vital Sign Monitoring in Acutely Unwell Hospital at Home Patients: a Feasibility Study

  • Rachel Claire Greer; 
  • C Roman; 
  • M Shi; 
  • B Gooch; 
  • BK Lawson; 
  • C Biggs; 
  • C Edwards; 
  • S Vollam; 
  • P Watkinson; 
  • L Tarassenko; 
  • A Farmer; 
  • D Lasserson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Remote vital sign monitoring of acute hospital at home (aHAH) patients is recommended in policy without clear guidance on implementation. While such monitoring has the potential to improve patient care, there is limited evidence for its feasibility and acceptability.

Objective:

We aimed to pilot the use of a remote, community-based monitoring system using a vital sign wearable patch and pulse oximeter in aHAH patients. We also explored the remote monitoring of blood pressure (BP) and temperature in this patient group.

Methods:

In this feasibility study, participants were asked to wear a chest patch to estimate their heart rate and respiratory rate (passive monitoring), and to intermittently check their oxygen saturations, blood pressure and temperature (active monitoring). Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older with an acute illness requiring aHAH care. Pregnant women and those with contraindications to monitoring were excluded. Participants were monitored for up to 7 days and asked to complete a technology assessment questionnaire. The primary outcomes were the proportion of 4-hour monitoring windows with a recorded heart rate and 12-hour daytime windows with a recorded oxygen saturation level.

Results:

In total, 25 participants completed the study, 600/674 (89.0%) of the 4-hour monitoring windows had a heart rate and 508/674 (75.4%) had a respiratory rate recorded. For the 12-hour daytime windows, 75/129 (58.1%) had an oxygen saturation, 70/129 (54.3%) had a blood pressure and 66/129 (51.2%) had a temperature recorded. Data coverage was higher for the passive monitoring compared to the active monitoring. Most participants with capacity found the combined monitoring system easy to use and thought it was useful for their healthcare.

Conclusions:

Remote monitoring of vital signs in aHAH patients is feasible and acceptable to patients. Good data coverage was achieved for the passive monitoring which did not require specific actions by the participants or their caregivers. Further work is required to ascertain which patients would benefit most from this monitoring.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Greer RC, Roman C, Shi M, Gooch B, Lawson B, Biggs C, Edwards C, Vollam S, Watkinson P, Tarassenko L, Farmer A, Lasserson D

Remote Vital Sign Monitoring in Acutely Unwell Hospital at Home Patients: Nonrandomized Feasibility Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e84233

DOI: 10.2196/84233

PMID: 42789931

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.