Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 4, 2025 - Sep 29, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 24, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Optimizing Hospital Discharge Planning: Empirical Insights and Requirements of AI-based Technologies from an Explorative Mixed-Methods Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Discharge planning (DP) is crucial for care continuity after a hospital stay but remains complex due to organizational constraints, interprofessional coordination, and administrative demands. Despite ongoing digitalization efforts, many health technologies overlook the sociotechnical nature of discharge processes, limiting acceptance and integration into clinical workflows.
Objective:
To examine real-world DP practices in two German university hospitals, identify user-centered needs, and derive design implications for responsibly integrating AI-based systems into DP.
Methods:
A mixed-methods field study was conducted combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. In the qualitative phase, DP employees participated in workshops (n = 33). Additionally, expert interviews were conducted with 2 physicians and 3 nurses (n = 5). Activities explored understanding of AI, challenges in DP workflows, and best-case process scenarios; existing processes were collaboratively modeled to identify potential intervention points for technological support. Transcripts were analyzed inductively following Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. Quantitative data were collected through a standardized questionnaire (n = 23), focusing on workload distribution, process inefficiencies and openness to using AI in the DP context. Descriptive statistics were used to identify high-burden segments. Findings were integrated through methodological triangulation.
Results:
Persistent challenges emerged in interdisciplinary communication, documentation practices, and information continuity. Participants expressed uncertainty about the value of AI in DP, emphasizing the need for transparency, explainability, and role alignment. Questionnaire data confirmed bottlenecks in information transfer and high administrative workload. Design requirements for future systems include process transparency, support for coordination tasks, and adaptability to clinical roles.
Conclusions:
DP is a sociotechnical process in which human expertise and organizational context must guide system design. Participatory, context-aware design approaches are essential for integrating AI into clinical practice. Aligning technology with everyday workflows can increase acceptance and yield more effective digital interventions.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.