Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 1, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 2, 2025 - Sep 27, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 27, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
An Implementation of the Personalized Automated Reading Delivery System (PARDS) as a Component of Precision Medical Education: A Prospective Crossover Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
While Precision Medical Education (PME) provides a framework for physician education through data collection on learners and identifying knowledge gaps, logistical difficulties in the delivery of personalized educational interventions hinder its implementation in existing curricula.
Objective:
We developed the Personalized Automated Reading Delivery System (PARDS) software application to support a potential PME intervention, aiming to increase resident physician reading volume.
Methods:
From July 2018-December 2018, a pilot prospective crossover study was performed with N=10 PGY2 anesthesiology residents within an academic medical center (response rate 10/10, 100%). Residents were randomly assigned to the PARDS program for 2 of the 4 months of the study period. The primary outcomes were organizational viability, evaluated by total expenses and faculty-hours, and acceptability within the study population, assessed by number of reported weekly reading hours. Simple logistic regression analysis was performed to compare intervention vs non-intervention conditions.
Results:
Total reported faculty time involvement for the study period was 24 hours. The cost-estimate for implementation ranged from $2360-$8360. The mean difference of recorded reading hours by residents while participating in PARDS verses not participating in PARDS for months 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the study was 2.56 (95% CI -0.03-5.15, P=.053), 0.44 (95% CI -2.15-3.03, P= .737), 0.99 (95% CI -1.38-3.36, P=.413), and 3.7 (95% CI 1.34-6.08, P=.002), respectively.
Conclusions:
The PARDS was successfully implemented in an academic medical center. Calculated costs indicate that PARDS is an inexpensive intervention compared to contemporary alternatives. Effect on resident reading requires further research.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.