Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 28, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 3, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Managing Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Patient Perceptions, Barriers, and Facilitators

Park S, Park YS, Hong D, Kang B

Managing Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Patient Perceptions, Barriers, and Facilitators

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e81404

DOI: 10.2196/81404

PMID: 41874552

Managing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A scoping review protocol of patient perceptions, barriers, and facilitators

  • Sikyeong Park; 
  • Yu Shin Park; 
  • Dahye Hong; 
  • Bada Kang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is a major global health concern affecting over 30% of adults worldwide. Closely linked with metabolic comorbidities such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia, MASLD relies heavily on lifestyle modification for effective management. However, sustaining healthy behaviors remains challenging, specifically owing to the disease’s asymptomatic nature in its early stages and low perceived severity among patients. Thus, understanding patient perceptions and identifying barriers and facilitators are essential for developing effective, patient-centered interventions.

Objective:

This scoping review protocol aims to systematically map the existing literature on patients’ perceptions of MASLD, and to identify barriers and facilitators influencing disease management and patient engagement.

Methods:

This study will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search is conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO using MeSH terms and keywords such as “MASLD,” “NAFLD,” “perception,” “awareness,” “attitude,” “barriers,” and “facilitators." Two independent reviewers screen studies, extract data using a standardized charting form, and resolve discrepancies through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Eligible studies will include adults with MASLD/NAFLD and will focus on patient perceptions, health beliefs, behaviors, or barriers and facilitators to management. Findings will be synthesized narratively and presented in both textual and table formats.

Results:

The results will be reported in a forthcoming scoping review, which is expected to be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal by early 2026.

Conclusions:

This study will offer a comprehensive overview of patients’ perceptions of MASLD, and the barriers and facilitators that influence its management. The findings will inform the development of patient-centered strategies aimed at improving care delivery and reducing disease burden.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Park S, Park YS, Hong D, Kang B

Managing Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Patient Perceptions, Barriers, and Facilitators

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e81404

DOI: 10.2196/81404

PMID: 41874552

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.