Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jun 6, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 7, 2017 - Aug 1, 2017
Date Accepted: Sep 28, 2017
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Challenges During Implementation of a Patient-Facing Mobile App for Surgical Rehabilitation: Feasibility Study

Lau AY, Piper K, Bokor D, Martin P, Lau VS, Coiera E

Challenges During Implementation of a Patient-Facing Mobile App for Surgical Rehabilitation: Feasibility Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2017;4(4):e31

DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.8096

PMID: 29217504

PMCID: 5740262

Challenges During Implementation of a Patient-Facing Mobile App for Surgical Rehabilitation: Feasibility Study

  • Annie YS Lau; 
  • Kalman Piper; 
  • Desmond Bokor; 
  • Paige Martin; 
  • Victor SL Lau; 
  • Enrico Coiera

ABSTRACT

Background:

Translating research into practice, especially the implementation of digital health technologies in routine care, is increasingly important. Yet, there are few studies examining the challenges of implementing patient-facing digital technologies in health care settings.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to report challenges experienced when implementing mobile apps for patients to support their postsurgical rehabilitation in an orthopedic setting.

Methods:

A mobile app was tailored to the needs of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. A 30-min usability session and a 12-week feasibility study were conducted with patients to evaluate the app in routine care. Implementation records (observation reports, issues log, and email correspondence) explored factors that hindered or facilitated patient acceptance. Interviews with clinicians explored factors that influenced app integration in routine care.

Results:

Participant completion was low (47%, 9/19). Factors that affected patient acceptance included digital literacy, health status, information technology (IT) infrastructure at home, privacy concerns, time limitations, the role of a caregiver, inconsistencies in instruction received from clinicians and the app, and app advice not reflective of patient progress over time. Factors that negatively influenced app integration in routine care included competing demands among clinicians, IT infrastructure in health care settings, identifying the right time to introduce the app to patients, user interface complexity for older patients, lack of coordination among multidisciplinary clinicians, and technical issues with app installation.

Conclusions:

Three insights were identified for mobile app implementation in routine care: (1) apps for patients need to reflect their journey over time and in particular, postoperative apps ought to be introduced as part of preoperative care with opportunities for patients to learn and adopt the app during their postoperative journey; (2) strategies to address digital literacy issues among patients and clinicians are essential; and (3) impact of the app on patient outcomes and clinician workflow needs to be communicated, monitored, and reviewed. Lastly, digital health interventions should supplement but not replace patient interaction with clinicians.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lau AY, Piper K, Bokor D, Martin P, Lau VS, Coiera E

Challenges During Implementation of a Patient-Facing Mobile App for Surgical Rehabilitation: Feasibility Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2017;4(4):e31

DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.8096

PMID: 29217504

PMCID: 5740262

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.