Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Engaging Hospital Staff to Identify Levers for Adoption of Clinical Decision Support: Protocol for a Single-Site Case Study Using System Dynamics Group Model Building

Sperber NR, Zimmerman LE, Caton L, Rust T, Bedoya A, Haas S, Orlando L, Goldstein B

Engaging Hospital Staff to Identify Levers for Adoption of Clinical Decision Support: Protocol for a Single-Site Case Study Using System Dynamics Group Model Building

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e80848

DOI: 10.2196/80848

PMID: 42013437

Engaging Hospital Staff to Identify Levers for Clinical Decision Support Adoption: System Dynamics Group Model Building

  • Nina Rachel Sperber; 
  • Lindsey Eileen Zimmerman; 
  • Lauren Caton; 
  • Tom Rust; 
  • Armando Bedoya; 
  • Sarah Haas; 
  • Lori Orlando; 
  • Ben Goldstein

ABSTRACT

Background:

Clinical Decision Support tools that provide patient-specific and evidence-based information to providers and care-managers regarding patient risk for adverse outcomes have been a part of health care for decades. However, modern clinical decision support, which consist of automated predictions based on complex machine learning models and hundreds of complex input variables, faces obstacles to adoption related to providers’ perceptions of lack of transparency and utility. Often the expertise of data scientists and clinical end users are nt well-integrated, creating implementation gaps from clinical decision support development to adoption and ongoing implementation.

Objective:

We developed this protocol to enlist group model building from system dynamics. GMB activities bring multidisciplinary stakeholders together to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of one class of clinical decision support in general medical-surgical wards, early warning scores. By modeling the adoption and implementation of the early warning score clinical decision support in general medical-surgical wards, we have sought to evaluate GMB activities as a generalizable strategy for improving clinical decision support adoption and implementation in other contexts.

Methods:

We have worked with health system interest holders to co-develop a model of facilitators and barriers to early warning score adoption in workshops that apply System Dynamics Modeling techniques of eliciting key variables, describing their behavior over time, and producing a diagram that illustrates the stock-and-flow and feedback dynamics of early warning score adoption and implementation over time.

Results:

The end result will consist of an initial demonstration model that formally depicts dynamic hypotheses about how system behavior affects clinical decision support early warning score uptake.

Conclusions:

Completion of these aims will advance knowledge about the practice of improving machine learning-enabled clinical decision support adoption and implementation using group model building.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sperber NR, Zimmerman LE, Caton L, Rust T, Bedoya A, Haas S, Orlando L, Goldstein B

Engaging Hospital Staff to Identify Levers for Adoption of Clinical Decision Support: Protocol for a Single-Site Case Study Using System Dynamics Group Model Building

JMIR Res Protoc 2026;15:e80848

DOI: 10.2196/80848

PMID: 42013437

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.