Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Jul 13, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 13, 2025 - Sep 7, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of Bidirectional and Threshold-Response Associations Between Cognitive Function and Physical Performance: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

Hu H, Xie L, Hao Y, Zhao Y, Luo H, Yu K, Sun C

Assessment of Bidirectional and Threshold-Response Associations Between Cognitive Function and Physical Performance: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e80575

DOI: 10.2196/80575

PMID: 41232033

PMCID: 12616459

Bidirectional and Threshold-Response Associations Between Cognitive Function and Physical Performance: Evidence From a Nationwide Multicenter Study in China

  • Huixiu Hu; 
  • Lanying Xie; 
  • Yuqing Hao; 
  • Yajie Zhao; 
  • Huanhuan Luo; 
  • Kang Yu; 
  • Chao Sun

ABSTRACT

Background:

The global aging population faces increasing risks of cognitive and physical decline, yet the bidirectional and nonlinear dynamics between these domains remain poorly understood.

Objective:

To investigate the bidirectional and nonlinear associations between cognitive function and physical performance in older adults, and to identify threshold effects and population subgroups at elevated risk.

Methods:

A multicenter study of 20,868 older adults in China analyzed the bidirectional asymmetric and threshold-response associations between cognitive and physical function using logistic/linear regression and RCS, with subgroup and interaction analyses.

Results:

The study revealed an asymmetrical bidirectional relationship between cognitive function and physical performance, with cognitive impairment having a stronger effect on physical function (SPPB, OR = 2.45 vs. P > 0.05; gait speed: OR = 2.36 vs. 1.89). RCS analysis identified three key inflection points at MMSE scores of 19, 24, and 29. When MMSE < 24, cognitive improvement significantly protected physical performance (SPPB: OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.84–0.87; gait speed: OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82–0.85). The critical intervention window was between MMSE 19–24 (SPPB, OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57,0.77). At MMSE ≥ 24, balance protection remained significant (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.68–0.70), but overall physical performance showed diminished effects (SPPB, P > 0.05). A paradoxical reversal effect was observed for gait speed (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.04–1.07). High-income (OR = 5.24, 95% CI: 3.91–7.02) and high-education subgroups (OR = 3.98, 95% CI: 1.48–10.70) exhibited heightened vulnerability.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates a bidirectional, asymmetric relationship between cognitive function and physical performance, identifies a nonlinear threshold effect, and highlights population heterogeneity.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hu H, Xie L, Hao Y, Zhao Y, Luo H, Yu K, Sun C

Assessment of Bidirectional and Threshold-Response Associations Between Cognitive Function and Physical Performance: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e80575

DOI: 10.2196/80575

PMID: 41232033

PMCID: 12616459

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.