Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Jun 27, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 27, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 3, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Enhancing Clinical Competencies Through Peer Role-Play in Oncology Graduate Students: Mixed Methods Study

Wang Y, Wang F, Liu G, luo Y, Ba H, Long J

Enhancing Clinical Competencies Through Peer Role-Play in Oncology Graduate Students: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e79771

DOI: 10.2196/79771

PMID: 41314642

PMCID: 12701340

Enhancing Clinical Competencies through Peer Role-Play: A Study on Oncology Graduate Student Training

  • Yao Wang; 
  • Feixiang Wang; 
  • Gaojie Liu; 
  • Yuqing luo; 
  • Hongjun Ba; 
  • Jie Long

ABSTRACT

Background:

Clinical competency is essential for oncology students to deliver high-quality patient care. However, traditional teaching methods may not fully support the development of critical skills such as communication, empathy, and clinical judgment. Peer role-play has emerged as a promising approach to bridge these gaps by enhancing interpersonal and diagnostic competencies within clinical settings.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of peer role-play in developing clinical competencies among oncology graduate students during their clinical rotation.

Methods:

This study involved 70 first-year oncology graduate students from Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Hospital in a three-month clinical rotation within the Department of Oncology from January 2022 to December 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to either a peer role-play group (n = 35) or a traditional teaching group (n = 35), ensuring balanced gender and baseline competencies. The role-play group engaged in a structured curriculum that included case presentation, classroom instruction, and weekly role-play sessions, with debriefing and feedback sessions following each role-play. The traditional group adhered to a standard curriculum without role-play exercises. Assessments included a baseline Oncology Theory Exam, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for clinical competency evaluation, and a satisfaction survey for the role-play group.

Results:

Baseline theory exam scores were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the peer role-play group demonstrated significant improvements in doctor-patient communication, medical history taking, clinical judgment, and overall clinical competence compared to the traditional teaching group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, students in the role-play group reported high levels of satisfaction, citing scenario realism, communication practice opportunities, and feedback quality as key benefits.

Conclusions:

The study indicates that peer role-play is an effective educational approach for developing clinical competencies in oncology graduate students, particularly in communication, empathy, and clinical reasoning. Role-play provides an engaging and practical learning experience, making it a valuable addition to clinical training programs aimed at enhancing patient-centered care skills in students.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang Y, Wang F, Liu G, luo Y, Ba H, Long J

Enhancing Clinical Competencies Through Peer Role-Play in Oncology Graduate Students: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e79771

DOI: 10.2196/79771

PMID: 41314642

PMCID: 12701340

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.