Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: May 29, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 26, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Transitions in Sarcopenia Status and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Longitudinal Cohort Study

Luo C, Wu H, Shen X, Han S, Lin L, Liu B

Transitions in Sarcopenia Status and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e78277

DOI: 10.2196/78277

PMID: 41401243

PMCID: 12707442

Transitions in Sarcopenia Status and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

  • Chun Luo; 
  • Hao Wu; 
  • Xiaoying Shen; 
  • Shuang Han; 
  • Lv Lin; 
  • Bingyang Liu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Baseline sarcopenia has been linked to cognitive decline in older adults; however, the impact of longitudinal changes in sarcopenia status on cognitive trajectories remains unclear.

Objective:

To examine the association between two-year transitions in sarcopenia status and subsequent five-year cognitive trajectories among middle-aged and older adults in China.

Methods:

We analyzed data from 8,189 participants (median age 58 years; 52.9% female) in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Sarcopenia status was determined in 2011 and 2013 according to the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria, and participants were classified into seven transition groups based on status changes. Cognitive function was assessed from 2013 to 2018 using standardized Z-scores for executive function and episodic memory. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to evaluate associations between sarcopenia transitions and cognitive trajectories, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and health-related covariates.

Results:

Progression from a non-sarcopenic state was associated with greater cognitive decline compared to stable non-sarcopenia (β = –0.016; 95% CI –0.026 to –0.007; P < .001), with greater decline observed among those progressing from possible sarcopenia to sarcopenia (β = –0.027; 95% CI –0.054 to –0.001; P = .04). In contrast, regression from possible sarcopenia was associated with improved cognitive performance (β = 0.028; 95% CI 0.015 to 0.041; P < .001). No significant improvement was observed among individuals regressing from established sarcopenia. Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits of regression from possible sarcopenia across sex, age, residence, and education groups, except among urban residents (P = .05).

Conclusions:

Progression in sarcopenia status was independently associated with accelerated cognitive decline, whereas regression from possible sarcopenia predicted cognitive benefit. These findings highlight possible sarcopenia as a clinically actionable and potentially reversible stage and underscore the importance of early identification and intervention to preserve cognitive health in aging populations. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Luo C, Wu H, Shen X, Han S, Lin L, Liu B

Transitions in Sarcopenia Status and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in China: Longitudinal Cohort Study

JMIR Aging 2025;8:e78277

DOI: 10.2196/78277

PMID: 41401243

PMCID: 12707442

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.