Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 24, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 9, 2025
Utilisation of Netnography as a Healthcare Research Methodology: A Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Netnography is an emergent qualitative methodology adapted from ethnography to explore interactions and cultural dynamics within digital environments. While increasingly used in healthcare research, its application remains inconsistent, particularly in relation to methodological transparency and ethical reporting. Given netnography’s growing use in healthcare and the limited guidance on its application, a timely review of how it is defined and operationalised in the literature is warranted.
Objective:
This scoping review aimed to examine how and why netnography has been used in healthcare studies.
Methods:
A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Comprehensive searches across 20 databases and grey literature sources identified peer-reviewed and academic studies using netnography or netnographic methods within healthcare. Studies were screened, charted, and analysed narratively. Inclusion criteria were informed by NICE topic classifications.
Results:
Eighty-two studies were included, spanning diverse healthcare topics, populations, and digital platforms. Netnography was frequently applied to explore health communication, chronic illness, patient empowerment, and healthcare experiences, particularly in stigmatised or hard-to-reach groups. Ethical transparency varied widely: only 33 studies reported formal ethical approval, and just over half addressed informed consent.
Conclusions:
Netnography holds significant promise for healthcare research, offering insight into lived experience and access to otherwise inaccessible populations. Yet, inconsistent methodological and ethical reporting raises concerns about rigour and accountability. To strengthen future applications, clearer guidance is needed on ethical standards, methodological justification, and reporting practices, particularly when researching vulnerable groups and sensitive health issues. Clinical Trial: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with a registered protocol on the Open Science Framework (OSF Registries: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQZ2F, registered 08/08/2024).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.