Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: May 16, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 16, 2025 - Jul 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 27, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Accuracy of Deep Learning for Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wang X, Li T, Wang X, Fu D

Accuracy of Deep Learning for Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e77593

DOI: 10.2196/77593

PMID: 15153756

Accuracy of Deep Learning for Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Xueying Wang; 
  • Tiantian Li; 
  • Xiaohang Wang; 
  • Deyuan Fu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) serves as a critical factor in predicting breast cancer (BC). However, the noninvasive prediction of ALNM remains challenging. While some deep learning (DL) models have been developed for preoperative ALNM assessment, their performance lacks systematic evaluation.

Objective:

This study evaluates DL’s effectiveness in detecting ALNM, offering evidence to guide clinical diagnostic tools.

Methods:

Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched up to May 26, 2024. The QUADAS-2 was utilized to assess the risk of bias in the selected studies. A bivariate mixed-effects model was applied, and subgroup analyses were carried out based on different imaging modalities.

Results:

21 studies (14,501 BC patients, including 4,141 LNM cases) were analyzed. Regarding ultrasound- based DL for detecting LNM, the sensitivity was 0.82 (0.77–0.86);the specificity was 0.79 (0.71–0.85); the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 3.9 (2.8–5.4); the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.23 (0.18–0.29); the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 17 (11–25),and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) was 0.87 (0.26–0.99). Regarding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based DL for predicting LNM, the sensitivity was 0.76 (0.68–0.83); the specificity was 0.84 (0.80–0.87); the LR+ was 4.7 (3.7–6.0); the LR- was 0.28 (0.21–0.39); the DOR was 17 (10–26); and SROC was 0.88 (0.40–0.99).

Conclusions:

Current DL approaches for detecting ALNM in BC primarily rely on US and MRI. Both US- and MRI-based DL showed good diagnostic performance, offering evidence for developing/updating clinical diagnostic models. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang X, Li T, Wang X, Fu D

Accuracy of Deep Learning for Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e77593

DOI: 10.2196/77593

PMID: 15153756

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.