Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: May 7, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: May 13, 2025 - May 23, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 24, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating Tuberculosis Surveillance Using Global Standards and Benchmarks in the Philippines: Mixed Methods Study

Ahson M, Gaviola DM, O'Connor S, Gutierrez A, Apas M, Eguia MA, Pacial DR, Zamora A, Lacson R, De Guzman A, Moonan PK

Evaluating Tuberculosis Surveillance Using Global Standards and Benchmarks in the Philippines: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e77058

DOI: 10.2196/77058

PMID: 41941719

Evaluating Tuberculosis Surveillance Using Global Standards and Benchmarks in the Philippines

  • Minal Ahson; 
  • Donna Mae Gaviola; 
  • Stephanie O'Connor; 
  • Andro Gutierrez; 
  • Marvin Apas; 
  • Maria Alezandra Eguia; 
  • Devon Ray Pacial; 
  • Arianne Zamora; 
  • Romel Lacson; 
  • Alethea De Guzman; 
  • Patrick K. Moonan

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Philippines accounts for 7% of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden. In 2022, an estimated 741,000 Filipinos developed TB and 40,000 died as a result. Approximately 350,000 new TB diagnoses remain unreported annually.

Objective:

In October 2023, we undertook an assessment of the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the national TB surveillance system using globally-accepted TB surveillance standards and benchmarks assessment tool.

Methods:

A team of Filipino and international evaluators conducted field visits to nine purposively selected health facilities across four regions. Health records were reviewed and key informants were interviewed to assess essential activities and best practices.

Results:

Among 16 applicable performance standards, four were fully met, nine were partially met, and three were not met. This was an improvement from a similar assessment conducted in 2019. Although electronic case-based recording and reporting had expanded greatly since 2019, large local variations in the adoption of quality assurance practices were evident. Over 60% of reported persons with TB had no bacteriological confirmation, despite a functional national laboratory network. Under-reporting due to underdiagnosis was also noted. Delayed reporting was common, especially in locations with limited internet connectivity or access to antituberculosis medications.

Conclusions:

Issues related to data quality assurance, gaps in case verification and timeliness emerged as potential threats to data integrity and surveillance fidelity. Enhanced monitoring and evaluation and tailored studies, such as a national TB inventory study, could assist in quantifying potential under-reporting and clinical overdiagnosis, guiding future funding, and assessing progress toward elimination targets. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ahson M, Gaviola DM, O'Connor S, Gutierrez A, Apas M, Eguia MA, Pacial DR, Zamora A, Lacson R, De Guzman A, Moonan PK

Evaluating Tuberculosis Surveillance Using Global Standards and Benchmarks in the Philippines: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2026;12:e77058

DOI: 10.2196/77058

PMID: 41941719

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.