Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 29, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Quality Assessment of Shock Videos on Video Sharing Platforms: Cross-Sectional Study

Wang W, Cheng L, Hu X, Pan C

Quality Assessment of Shock Videos on Video Sharing Platforms: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e76715

DOI: 10.2196/76715

PMID: 41468567

PMCID: 12753100

Quality assessment of shock videos on video sharing platforms:A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Wenxin Wang; 
  • Luping Cheng; 
  • Xia Hu; 
  • Chuanliang Pan

ABSTRACT

Background:

As a highly lethal circulatory failure syndrome, the pathophysiological mechanisms of shock can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which significantly increases the demand for intensive care and the length of hospitalisation.)There is an urgent need for the public to be informed about health-related issues. In recent years, short videos have become a significant medium for health education, and this study aimed to evaluate shock-related videos on short video sharing platforms.

Objective:

Assess the quality of the short video dissemination about shock.

Methods:

Videos featuring shocking content were retrieved from three short video-sharing platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and mDISCERN tools were utilised to evaluate the credibility and quality of the videos, in addition to employing the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool for Audiovisual Content (PEMAT-A/V). Finally, the video was evaluated by examining disease definitions, clinical signs and symptoms, risk factors, assessment, management, and outcomes.

Results:

A total of 244 short videos were retrieved from the three platforms.The overall video quality was found to be moderately low. The individual video sources of the GQS were of lower quality (1-3), and the mDISCERN scores were moderate (2-4),with health advocates demonstrating the highest level of quality, followed by health professionals as the second most proficient.The PEMAT A/V scores were as follows: 91% of the overall comprehensibility scores were greater than 60, 65% of the operability scores were greater than 60, and 73% of the overall levels were greater than 60. The definition of shock and its clinical signs and symptoms were clearly explained in 172 videos (70.4%), and in 137 videos (56.1%), respectively.

Conclusions:

he analysis revealed that the content and information quality of the videos was, overall, not satisfactory. This underscores the necessity for relevant authorities to oversee the quality of health-related short videos, thereby assisting the public in the early prevention and treatment of diseases. Clinical Trial: no


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang W, Cheng L, Hu X, Pan C

Quality Assessment of Shock Videos on Video Sharing Platforms: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e76715

DOI: 10.2196/76715

PMID: 41468567

PMCID: 12753100

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.