Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Apr 26, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 24, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptance of AI-Powered Chatbots Among Physiotherapy Students: International Cross-Sectional Study

El-Sobkey SB, Kelini KI, ElKholy M, Abdeldayem T, Abdallah M, Mohamed DAA, Fawzy A, Ahmed YF, El Khatib A, Khalid H, Shaik BB, Anjos A, Alharbi MD, Fathy K, Takey K

Acceptance of AI-Powered Chatbots Among Physiotherapy Students: International Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e76574

DOI: 10.2196/76574

PMID: 40829169

PMCID: 12364448

Acceptance of AI-powered chatbots among physiotherapy students: International cross-sectional study

  • Salwa B. El-Sobkey; 
  • Kerolous Ishak Kelini; 
  • Mahmoud ElKholy; 
  • Tayseer Abdeldayem; 
  • Mariam Abdallah; 
  • Dina Al-Amir Mohamed; 
  • Aya Fawzy; 
  • Yomna F. Ahmed; 
  • Ayman El Khatib; 
  • Hind Khalid; 
  • Balkhis Banu Shaik; 
  • Ana Anjos; 
  • Mutasim D. Alharbi; 
  • Karim Fathy; 
  • Khaled Takey

ABSTRACT

Background:

AI-powered chatbots (AI-PCs) are increasingly integrated into educational settings, including healthcare disciplines. Despite their potential to enhance learning, limited research has investigated physiotherapy students’ (PTSs) acceptance of this technology.

Objective:

This study aims to assess undergraduate PTSs’ acceptance of AI-PCs and to identify personal, academic, and technological factors influencing their acceptance.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted across seven physiotherapy programs in five countries. Eligible participants were national undergraduate PTSs. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)-based questionnaire was used for capturing perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), attitude (A), behavioral intention (BI), and actual behavioral use (ABU) of AI-PCs. Influence of personal, academic, and technological factors were examined. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted.

Results:

A total of 1066 PTSs participated. TAM Overall score was 3.59 (out of 5), indicating moderate acceptance. High acceptance was reported by 35.2% of students, while 60.9% reported moderate acceptance. Prior experience with AI- tools emerged as the strongest predictor of acceptance (β=0.43, P= 0.0001). University affiliation was also a significant predictor. CGPA% and current utilization showed significant correlation/ association with PTSs’ acceptance but were not significant predictors. Either age, gender, or academic level showed any significant correlation/ association with acceptance. Significant differences in TAM scores and construct means were observed across universities.

Conclusions:

Physiotherapy students demonstrated moderate acceptance of AI-PCs. Prior technological experience was the strongest predictor, underscoring the importance of early exposure to AI tools. Educational institutions should consider integrating AI technologies to enhance students' familiarity and foster positive attitudes toward their use.


 Citation

Please cite as:

El-Sobkey SB, Kelini KI, ElKholy M, Abdeldayem T, Abdallah M, Mohamed DAA, Fawzy A, Ahmed YF, El Khatib A, Khalid H, Shaik BB, Anjos A, Alharbi MD, Fathy K, Takey K

Acceptance of AI-Powered Chatbots Among Physiotherapy Students: International Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e76574

DOI: 10.2196/76574

PMID: 40829169

PMCID: 12364448

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.