Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mental Health Professionals’ Perceptions of Benefits and Disadvantages of Telehealth: International Mixed Methods Study

Montoya MI, Kogan CS, Khoury B, Garcia-Pacheco JA, Robles R, Rebello TJ, Kulygina M, Reed GM

Mental Health Professionals’ Perceptions of Benefits and Disadvantages of Telehealth: International Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e75905

DOI: 10.2196/75905

PMID: 41780920

Mental Health Professionals’ Perceptions of Benefits and Disadvantages of Telehealth: An International Mixed Methods Study

  • Madeline I. Montoya; 
  • Cary S. Kogan; 
  • Brigitte Khoury; 
  • José A. Garcia-Pacheco; 
  • Rebeca Robles; 
  • Tahilia J. Rebello; 
  • Maya Kulygina; 
  • Geoffrey M. Reed

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telehealth has become an integral component of mental health care delivery worldwide. Understanding provider perceptions is essential to guiding its continued implementation.

Objective:

This international study used quantitative and qualitative methodologies to examine and broaden our understanding of the benefits and concerns related to telehealth for mental health care.

Methods:

An internet-based survey was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic between November 11 and December 18, 2020, among mental health professionals, primarily psychiatrists and psychologists, registered with WHO’s Global Clinical Practice Network (GCPN). Participants who consented and completed the telehealth section of the survey were included in the present study. Clinicians completed the survey in one of six languages (Chinese, English, French, Japanese, Russian, or Spanish). Telehealth survey questions included quantitative questions about concerns and implementation, and an open-ended question about providers’ perspectives on the benefits of telehealth.

Results:

847 participants completed the telehealth section of the survey and 496 provided a response to the open-ended question. Quantitative data on telehealth use and concerns revealed that clinicians’ primary concerns focused on technical issues and clinical effectiveness relative to in-person services, specifically, loss of clinical information (e.g., non-verbal behaviour) and challenges with establishing a therapeutic alliance. Findings varied by profession, WHO region, and telehealth training and experience. Qualitative data examining benefits fell into three major areas: accessibility and reach of mental health services, efficiency and flexibility for clinicians, and enhancement of clinical processes and outcomes. Taken together, findings revealed a trade-off between telehealth benefits and disadvantages.

Conclusions:

From the perspective of mental health professionals, telehealth practice comes with key challenges and valuable benefits. Findings offer important considerations for implementation of telehealth systems, including the importance of training and education and balancing trade-offs to optimize care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Montoya MI, Kogan CS, Khoury B, Garcia-Pacheco JA, Robles R, Rebello TJ, Kulygina M, Reed GM

Mental Health Professionals’ Perceptions of Benefits and Disadvantages of Telehealth: International Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e75905

DOI: 10.2196/75905

PMID: 41780920

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.