Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 30, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Navigating the Boundaries of Teleconsultation—Capabilities, Limitations, and Pathways for Improvement: Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Patients With Stroke

Wong AKC, Lu X, Wang JX, Lin RSY, Su JJ, Wang RM, Kwok VWY

Navigating the Boundaries of Teleconsultation—Capabilities, Limitations, and Pathways for Improvement: Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Patients With Stroke

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e75841

DOI: 10.2196/75841

PMID: 40966686

PMCID: 12491883

Navigating the Boundaries of Teleconsultation: Capabilities, Limitations, and Pathways for Improvement—A Qualitative Study on Stroke Patients' Experiences

  • Arkers Kwan Ching Wong; 
  • Xiaomin Lu; 
  • Joyce Xiaoli Wang; 
  • Rose Sin Yi Lin; 
  • Jing Jing Su; 
  • Robbie Mian Wang; 
  • Vivian Wai Yan Kwok

ABSTRACT

Background:

Stroke survivors often face persistent challenges accessing post-discharge care due to mobility limitations, transportation burdens, and inflexible scheduling. Teleconsultation has emerged as a potential solution to improve continuity of care, but its perceived strengths and limitations from the patient perspective remain insufficiently understood.

Objective:

This study explored stroke survivors’ experiences with a nurse-led teleconsultation program to identify perceived capabilities, limitations, and patient-informed recommendations for improvement.

Methods:

A qualitative study was embedded within a three-month nurse-led teleconsultation intervention. Twenty-one ischemic stroke survivors (aged 45–76 years; 11 female) participated in six focus groups conducted via Zoom. All participants had preserved cognitive function (MoCA ≥22) and access to smartphones. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s framework.

Results:

Participants widely valued teleconsultation for reducing logistical burdens, enhancing access, and offering a more comfortable, emotionally supportive setting for follow-up care. Many reported increased awareness and motivation for self-monitoring. However, limitations included an inability to perform physical assessments or respond to emergencies, digital and usability barriers—especially among older users—and scheduling inflexibility. Participants emphasized the need for patient-initiated follow-up mechanisms, physician collaboration for medication management, and greater support for digitally marginalized users. They also highlighted the potential of teleconsultation to serve as a triage tool, reserving in-person care for complex cases.

Conclusions:

Stroke survivors viewed nurse-led teleconsultation as a valuable component of post-stroke care, particularly for stable follow-ups and psychosocial support. However, its long-term viability depends on addressing clinical and technical limitations, enhancing user autonomy, and integrating interdisciplinary input. These findings offer actionable insights to guide the development of more inclusive, responsive, and patient-centered teleconsultation models.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wong AKC, Lu X, Wang JX, Lin RSY, Su JJ, Wang RM, Kwok VWY

Navigating the Boundaries of Teleconsultation—Capabilities, Limitations, and Pathways for Improvement: Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Patients With Stroke

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e75841

DOI: 10.2196/75841

PMID: 40966686

PMCID: 12491883

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.