Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Apr 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 12, 2025 - Jun 7, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 15, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Exploring the Impact of Perceived Parental Oversight on Problematic Smartphone Use Among Adolescents in the Digital Age: Database Analysis

Ho M, Schulz PJ, Chang A

Exploring the Impact of Perceived Parental Oversight on Problematic Smartphone Use Among Adolescents in the Digital Age: Database Analysis

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e75837

DOI: 10.2196/75837

PMID: 41343851

PMCID: 12677870

Exploring the Impact of Perceived Parental Oversight on Problematic Smartphone Use Among Adolescents in the Digital Age: A Database Analysis

  • Mary Ho; 
  • Peter Johannes Schulz; 
  • Angela Chang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The proliferation of smartphones raises worries over their impact on adolescent development, especially problematic smartphone use. This research investigates the intricacies of problematic smartphone usage in adolescents, particularly in light of significant increases in screen time, from a developmental psychology perspective.

Objective:

This study enhances our comprehension of teenage development about digital addiction by grounding its findings in developmental theory.

Methods:

A nationwide dataset from Taiwan’s annual survey (N = 1,673; ages 10-18) was analyzed using descriptive analysis and moderated multiple serial mediation regression. Three parental mediation styles—restrictive monitoring, evaluative mediation, and unfocused monitoring—were examined for their effects on smartphone usage and well-being.

Results:

Rigorous surveillance is more beneficial for younger adolescents (ages 10–12), significantly reducing smartphone addiction. Conversely, as teenagers mature, the efficacy of restrictive approaches wanes. Adolescents aged 16 to 18 benefit more from evaluative mediation strategies that foster autonomy and encourage appropriate digital conduct. Restrictive monitoring significantly diminishes addiction by constraining internet access; yet, the diverse outcomes of assessment methods highlight the importance of qualitative engagement. Conversely, unfocused surveillance is ineffective, necessitating the use of targeted parental strategies.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the significance of developmentally suitable parental strategies to mitigate digital addiction and enhance teenage self-regulation. We urge policymakers to implement age-specific, evidence-based methods to improve digital literacy and overall well-being in youth. Future research should investigate the enduring psychological and behavioral impacts of parental mediation and analyze cross-cultural differences in digital parenting methodologies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ho M, Schulz PJ, Chang A

Exploring the Impact of Perceived Parental Oversight on Problematic Smartphone Use Among Adolescents in the Digital Age: Database Analysis

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e75837

DOI: 10.2196/75837

PMID: 41343851

PMCID: 12677870

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.