Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Apr 4, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 2, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Health Literacy and Tool Adoption in Postoperative Care in a Safety-Net Hospital Population: Mixed Methods Study

Awad C, Martinek AJ, Zou C, Byrd R, Ooi HJ, Do K, Young H, Adhyaru B, Idris M, Arriaga R

Digital Health Literacy and Tool Adoption in Postoperative Care in a Safety-Net Hospital Population: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e75496

DOI: 10.2196/75496

PMID: 41730170

PMCID: 12928685

Digital Health Literacy and Tool Adoption in Post-Operative Care: A Mixed-Methods Analysis from a Safety-Net Hospital Population

  • Christopher Awad; 
  • Alexander Jakub Martinek; 
  • Chunhao Zou; 
  • Rosalind Byrd; 
  • Hui Jean Ooi; 
  • Kimberly Do; 
  • Henry Young; 
  • Bhavin Adhyaru; 
  • Muhammed Idris; 
  • Rosa Arriaga

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health tools are increasingly prevalent in post-operative care management, yet limited research exists on digital health literacy and tool adoption among safety-net hospital populations. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective digital health solutions for historically underserved communities.

Objective:

To evaluate digital health literacy, assess technology adoption readiness, and examine the relationship between patient-reported capabilities and demographic factors in a post-operative care context at a safety-net hospital.

Methods:

We conducted a mixed-methods study with 71 post-operative patients and 29 healthcare providers. Participants completed a modified eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) assessment and demographic questionnaire, followed by usability testing of a digital health prototype. Digital health literacy was evaluated using a 10-point Likert scale, and correlations between demographic factors and digital health literacy were analyzed.

Results:

Despite common assumptions about technology barriers in safety-net populations, 69% of patients reported high confidence (score ≥3 on a 5-point scale) in finding health resources online, and 60.6% expressed confidence in using the internet for health-related questions. However, only 49.3% felt confident in using digital resources for health decision-making. Patient comfort with technology did not significantly correlate with age, but rather with prior technology exposure, with 78.9% reporting ≥10 years of digital device experience.

Conclusions:

Digital literacy and health literacy have been studied in safety-net contexts, but there is a dearth of research on digital health literacy in post-operative care and safety-net populations specifically. Our findings suggest that digital health tools may be more feasible in safety-net settings than previously considered. However, the gap between patients' ability to find health resources and their confidence in using these resources for health decision-making highlights the need for targeted support in translating digital capabilities into healthcare management skills.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Awad C, Martinek AJ, Zou C, Byrd R, Ooi HJ, Do K, Young H, Adhyaru B, Idris M, Arriaga R

Digital Health Literacy and Tool Adoption in Postoperative Care in a Safety-Net Hospital Population: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e75496

DOI: 10.2196/75496

PMID: 41730170

PMCID: 12928685

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.