Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Apr 1, 2025
Date Accepted: May 15, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Understanding Safety in Online Mental Health Forums: Realist Evaluation

Marshall P, Caton N, Glossop Z, Jones S, Meacock R, Rayson P, Robison H, Lobban F

Understanding Safety in Online Mental Health Forums: Realist Evaluation

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e75320

DOI: 10.2196/75320

PMID: 40577699

PMCID: 12227176

Understanding safety in online mental health forums: a realist evaluation

  • Paul Marshall; 
  • Neil Caton; 
  • Zoe Glossop; 
  • Stephen Jones; 
  • Rachel Meacock; 
  • Paul Rayson; 
  • Heather Robison; 
  • Fiona Lobban

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online forums are used widely to facilitate mental health peer support. However, concerns exist regarding potential harm associated with their use, and little is known about forum safety from the user perspective.

Objective:

This study sought to understand how users experience safety within online mental health peer support forums by refining realist programme theories developed in a previously published realist synthesis.

Methods:

Data was collected from 42 semi-structured realist interviews and 504 cross-sectional survey responses from users of three online mental health forums hosted by providers in the UK health service, corporate sector and voluntary sector, respectively. Analysis was informed by the principles of realist evaluation.

Results:

Survey responses revealed that over half of participants felt safe to post because of online anonymity (40.1% agreed, 19.2% strongly agreed), while a minority reported encountering distressing forum posts (18.8% agreed, 3.6% strongly agreed) and expressed concern that talking about mental health online could make them feel worse (22.4% agreed, 3.4% strongly agreed). Refined programme theories highlight: (1) the disclosure-promoting effect of anonymity, related to the mitigation of concerns that users’ mental health experiences could be linked to their offline identities; (2) the importance of proactive content moderation for addressing emerging safety issues; (3) a need for organizations to implement rule enforcement sensitively and balance between conversational openness and restricting topics likely to cause distress; (4) forum users’ experiences of self-moderating their exposure to potentially distressing online content; and (5) how the perceived non-judgement, authenticity, and similarity of other forum users generates interpersonal safety.

Conclusions:

Online forums hold promise as an accessible form of support for mental health. Results of this realist evaluation suggest that by better integrating timely harm-reduction procedures and cultivating a supportive interpersonal culture, forums are more likely to be perceived as safe spaces to seek mental health support.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Marshall P, Caton N, Glossop Z, Jones S, Meacock R, Rayson P, Robison H, Lobban F

Understanding Safety in Online Mental Health Forums: Realist Evaluation

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e75320

DOI: 10.2196/75320

PMID: 40577699

PMCID: 12227176

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.