Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Mar 31, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 24, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

An Overview of Reviews on Telemedicine and Telehealth in Dementia Care: Mixed Methods Synthesis

Borges do Nascimento IJ, Abdulazeem HM, Weerasekara I, Sharifan A, Grandi Bianco V, Kularathne I, Cunningham C, Sathian B, Deeken G, Østengaard L, Frederique-Djurdjevic R, Hoof Jv, Lazeri L, Redlich C, Marston HR, Sernizon Guimarães N, Barros Jd, dos Santos RA, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Yon Y, Novillo-Ortiz D

An Overview of Reviews on Telemedicine and Telehealth in Dementia Care: Mixed Methods Synthesis

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e75266

DOI: 10.2196/75266

PMID: 41194522

PMCID: 12975415

An Overview of Reviews on Telemedicine and Telehealth in Dementia Care: Evidence Across Clinical, Psychological, Behavioral, Social, and Economic Domains

  • Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento; 
  • Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem; 
  • Ishanka Weerasekara; 
  • Amin Sharifan; 
  • Victor Grandi Bianco; 
  • Indunil Kularathne; 
  • Ciara Cunningham; 
  • Brijesh Sathian; 
  • Genevieve Deeken; 
  • Lasse Østengaard; 
  • Rachel Frederique-Djurdjevic; 
  • Joost van Hoof; 
  • Ledia Lazeri; 
  • Cassie Redlich; 
  • Hannah R. Marston; 
  • Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães; 
  • Jerome de Barros; 
  • Ryan Alistar dos Santos; 
  • Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat; 
  • Yongjie Yon; 
  • David Novillo-Ortiz

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To collate data and critically assess data on the effectiveness, applicability, safety, and cost-efficiency of telemedicine and telehealth technologies in dementia care, providing a comprehensive summary of evidence spanning clinical, psychological, socio-economic, and operational impacts for both persons living with dementia and their caregivers. Design: Overview of systematic and scoping reviews. Data Sources: Five primary databases were searched for eligible reviews (MEDLINE®, Embase®, Scopus, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), along with a supplementary search of Google Scholar for Grey Literature. Utilized searches were performed by a senior information librarian affiliated to the Cochrane Collaboration on February 20, 2024. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: The review included both Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews, as well as scoping reviews. To be eligible, studies were required to report pre-defined outcomes related to telemedicine and telehealth interventions aimed at providing integrated care for individuals living with neurogenerative disorders or dementia diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementias, and frontotemporal dementias. The primary outcomes of eligible reviews assess the effects of specific interventions on mental health (i.e., psychiatric and psychological), quality of life, physical activity, hospitalization rates, financial costs, safety, social isolation, and motor function progression. Secondary outcomes evaluate how well the findings and concepts in the reviews align with the principles of the WHO Age-friendly Cities and Communities Framework and Dementia-Inclusive Societies Framework as reflected in their reporting. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Key characteristics of each review, including identifiers, journal and year of publication, and reported outcomes, as well as data on primary and secondary outcomes, were independently extracted by nine reviewers. The findings were synthesized using the TAME methodology, which combines thematic and lexical analyses with single-proportion meta-analysis to enhance understanding and visualization of both qualitative and quantitative data, enabling a comprehensive mixed-methods synthesis. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 framework, while the confidence in evidence for primary outcomes was appraised using the GRADE-CERQual approach.

Results:

Ninety-one reviews met inclusion criteria, providing a diverse range of evidence on the impact of telemedicine in dementia care. The most frequently reported outcomes were the effects of remote interventions on psychiatric and psychological well-being, particularly the reduction of depression and anxiety in people living with dementia and a decrease in caregiver burden (Relative Frequency of Occurrence [RFO]: 65% [95% CI 54% to 75%], moderate certainty of evidence). Furthermore, 57 studies highlighted the positive impact of telemedicine and telehealth on satisfaction and quality of life for (older) people living with dementia, caregivers, and healthcare providers (RFO: 63% [95% CI 52% to 73%], moderate certainty of evidence). Remote technology-related interventions for reduction of falls and managing behavioral symptoms were also frequently reported among the included (RFO: 33% [95% CI 23% to 44%], moderate certainty of evidence). These interventions additionally showed promising effectiveness in alleviating social isolation and feelings of loneliness (RFO: 31% [95% CI 22% to 41%], moderate certainty of evidence). However, the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews varied significantly, with the majority rated as low or critically-low quality due to methodological limitations.

Conclusions:

Telemedicine and telehealth have demonstrated to be effective and valuable tools in dementia care, offering significant benefits across psychological well-being, quality of life, and social impacts for both (older) people living with dementia patients and caregivers. However, the variability and heterogeneity in quality and reporting highlights the urgent need for more rigorous, and high-quality research in this area. This overview contributes to the existing body of literature by providing methodologically robust evidence, offering practical insights for clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and caregivers. It supports the adoption and implementation of telemedicine in dementia care, aligning with the strategies outlined in the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021–2030). Funding: None to declare. Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024511241


 Citation

Please cite as:

Borges do Nascimento IJ, Abdulazeem HM, Weerasekara I, Sharifan A, Grandi Bianco V, Kularathne I, Cunningham C, Sathian B, Deeken G, Østengaard L, Frederique-Djurdjevic R, Hoof Jv, Lazeri L, Redlich C, Marston HR, Sernizon Guimarães N, Barros Jd, dos Santos RA, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Yon Y, Novillo-Ortiz D

An Overview of Reviews on Telemedicine and Telehealth in Dementia Care: Mixed Methods Synthesis

JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e75266

DOI: 10.2196/75266

PMID: 41194522

PMCID: 12975415

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.