Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 31, 2025
Date Accepted: May 26, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Development and Evaluation of a Patient–Family Caregiver Dyad mHealth Intervention for Heart Failure Self-Care: Quasi-Experimental Study

Son YJ, Choi J, Kim HM, Won H, Youn JC, Kim SW, Lee WS, Cho JH, Park K, Hong J, Kim DY

Development and Evaluation of a Patient–Family Caregiver Dyad mHealth Intervention for Heart Failure Self-Care: Quasi-Experimental Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74922

DOI: 10.2196/74922

PMID: 40522724

PMCID: 12209723

Development and evaluation of patient-family caregiver dyads mHealth intervention for heart failure self-care: A quasi-experimental study

  • Youn-Jung Son; 
  • JiYeon Choi; 
  • Hyue Mee Kim; 
  • Hoyoun Won; 
  • Jong-Chan Youn; 
  • Sang-Wook Kim; 
  • Wang-Soo Lee; 
  • Jun Hwan Cho; 
  • Kyung‑Taek Park; 
  • Joonhwa Hong; 
  • Da-Young Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a lack of mobile health system (mHealth) interventions that engage both patients and their family caregivers for promoting heart failure (HF) self-care.

Objective:

The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to develop and confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of the novel mHealth intervention based on patient-family caregiver dyads for promoting HF patients’ self-care adherence.

Methods:

We developed a dyadic mHealth programs with two main features: a basic feature app and an interactive text-based chatbot. The intervention group (n=35 HF patients-family caregiver dyads) underwent a dyadic mHealth program for 24 weeks, while the control group (n=35 dyads) received the usual care. Self-care behaviors adherence, family caregivers’ contribution to self-care behaviors, and health-related quality of life were evaluated. Data was collected at the baseline and one-, three-, and six-months post-enrollment using self-administered questionnaire.

Results:

The intervention group had significantly better adherence to self-care behaviors (β=4.68, 95% CI 0.99-8.37) and family caregivers’ contribution to self-care behaviors (β=8.76, 95% CI 4.63-12.88) over six months compared to the control group. One-month follow-up scores of disease knowledge in patients (β=0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.29) and family caregivers (β=0.12, 95% CI 0.00-0.25) was significantly greater in the intervention group compared with the control group. The intervention also had a significant effect on mutuality at the one-month follow-ups in patients (β=0.11, 95% CI 0.00-0.21) and family caregivers (β=0.15, 95% CI 0.01-0.30).

Conclusions:

The study found that the dyadic mHealth intervention was beneficial in improving patients’ self-care behaviors adherence and family caregivers’ contribution to self-care behaviors by providing information and motivation, improving health-related quality of life in HF patients-family caregiver dyads. Clinical Trial: The trial has been prospectively registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Son YJ, Choi J, Kim HM, Won H, Youn JC, Kim SW, Lee WS, Cho JH, Park K, Hong J, Kim DY

Development and Evaluation of a Patient–Family Caregiver Dyad mHealth Intervention for Heart Failure Self-Care: Quasi-Experimental Study

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e74922

DOI: 10.2196/74922

PMID: 40522724

PMCID: 12209723

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.