Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Mar 17, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 18, 2025 - May 13, 2025
Date Accepted: Jul 30, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Longitudinal Observational Study Exploring the Sustained Usage of Technology-Enabled Intervention for Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Public Primary Care Setting in Singapore
ABSTRACT
Background:
Technology-enabled interventions for chronic disease management, such as telehealth systems for hypertension self-monitoring, have demonstrated effectiveness but face challenges with sustained usage and high attrition rates. Understanding the factors associated with continued engagement is crucial for enhancing intervention design and sustainability. This study investigates the sustained usage of the Primary Technology Enhanced Care for Hypertension Program (PTEC-HT) in Singapore’s public primary care setting, focusing on patient adherence and the generation of Missed Reading (MR) alerts.
Objective:
To explore the sustained usage of the PTEC-HT intervention by: (1) quantitatively describing characteristics of participants generating MR alerts, (2) identifying factors associated with MR alert generation, (3) profiling participant subgroups based on MR alert patterns and blood pressure (BP) control, and (4) examining temporal trajectories of MR alerts and associated conversion rates over 12 months.
Methods:
A longitudinal observational study was conducted using backend data from the PTEC-HT system. The study included 491 participants, categorized into MR alert generator and non-generator groups, recruited before June 2022. Logistic regression identified factors associated with MR alert generation, while Latent Class Analysis (LCA) profiled participant subgroups. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) examined temporal trajectories of MR alerts and conversion rates. Statistical significance was set at 5%.
Results:
Results:
MR alert generators were younger (mean age 58.6 years vs. 61.6 years; P=.011) and had a longer program duration (15.6 months vs. 15.0 months; P =.038). Age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99; P =.007) and program duration (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22; P =.030) were significantly associated with MR alert generation. LCA identified three latent classes: (a) Compliant Triers (low MR alerts, poor BP control), (b) Compliant Achievers (low MR alerts, good BP control, 74.9% (368/491) of sample), and (c) Non-Compliant Achievers (high MR alerts, good BP control). Temporal analysis showed consistent trajectories for Missed Reading Reminder (MRR) message counts and conversion rates, with MR alert generators having higher MRR message counts but lower conversion rates compared to non-generators.
Conclusions:
Sustained usage of the PTEC-HT program is influenced by age and program duration, with younger participants and longer durations linked to higher MR alert generation. The identification of distinct user profiles suggests that tailored intervention features could enhance engagement and BP control. The study underscores the importance of monitoring compliance patterns and optimizing message content to improve conversion rates. These insights contribute to the understanding of telehealth engagement dynamics and support targeted interventions for hypertension management.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.