Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 12, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 4, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study

Niu Y, Song G, Niu Z, Xiao S, Li C, Han N, Wan H, Hou X

Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73855

DOI: 10.2196/73855

PMID: 40961365

PMCID: 12443354

Quality and reliability of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis study

  • Yushuo Niu; 
  • Guilan Song; 
  • Zheyu Niu; 
  • Sijian Xiao; 
  • Cuicui Li; 
  • Na Han; 
  • Hao Wan; 
  • Xiaohong Hou

ABSTRACT

Background:

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, often requiring multiple sessions for optimal efficacy. TikTok and Bilibili have gained widespread popularity as easily accessible sources of health information.

Objective:

Our study aims to assess the quality of the information in Chinese short videos on TACE shared on the TikTok and Bilibili.

Methods:

In November 2024, the top 100 TACE-related Chinese-language short videos on TikTok and Bilibili (a total of 200 videos) were assessed and reviewed. Initially, basic information about the videos was recorded and analyzed. Subsequently, two assessment tools—Global Quality Score (GQS) and the DISCERN tool—were used to evaluate the information quality and reliability of the videos on both platforms. Finally, multifactorial analysis was employed to identify potential factors influencing the quality of the videos.

Results:

TikTok is more popular than Bilibili, despite its videos being shorter in length (P<0.05). The quality of short videos on TACE found on both platforms was of low quality, with average GQS scores of 2.31 (0.81) on TikTok and 2.48 (0.80) on Bilibili, as well as DISCERN scores of 1.93 (0.45) on TikTok and 2.09 (0.47) on Bilibili. The video duration (t=2.050, P=0.042; t=3.558, P<0.001) and the number of days (t=2.699, P=0.008; t=3.079, P=0.002) since publication were identified as predictive variables for video quality and reliability (t=2.050, P=0.042; t=3.558, P<0.001). The number of shares was found to be an independent factor influencing video quality (t=2.694, P=0.008), while the number of saves emerged as an independent factor affecting video reliability (t=3.273, P=0.001).

Conclusions:

Our study indicates that the quality of TACE-related health information in short videos on Bilibili and TikTok is suboptimal. Patients should exercise caution when relying on health-related information from these platforms. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the limitations of these videos and work to improve their quality. It is essential for the platforms to enhance their recommendation algorithms and implement measures for video quality assessment, especially when the content aims to educate and raise awareness on health-related topics. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Niu Y, Song G, Niu Z, Xiao S, Li C, Han N, Wan H, Hou X

Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73855

DOI: 10.2196/73855

PMID: 40961365

PMCID: 12443354

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.