Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Mar 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 18, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Differences in Hemodialysis Claim Patterns Across Membership Types Among Patients With Renal Failure Based on National Health Insurance Data From 2017 to 2022: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Munandar A, Hasibuan SR, Kusuma D

Differences in Hemodialysis Claim Patterns Across Membership Types Among Patients With Renal Failure Based on National Health Insurance Data From 2017 to 2022: Cross-Sectional Analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e73731

DOI: 10.2196/73731

PMID: 41183316

PMCID: 12624297

Differences in Hemodialysis Claim Patterns Across Membership Types Among Renal Failure Patients in Indonesia: Cross-sectional Analysis of National Health Insurance Data (2017–2022)

  • Aries Munandar; 
  • Syarif R Hasibuan; 
  • Dian Kusuma

ABSTRACT

Background:

Kidney diseases are leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally and in Indonesia. Despite expanded national health insurance coverage, disparities in hemodialysis access remain

Objective:

Our study aims to examine disparities in hemodialysis utilization among renal failure patients

Methods:

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 38,383 renal failure claims from BPJS Kesehatan from 2017 to 2022. Multivariate logistic regression models examined associations between hemodialysis access and BPJS membership types, demographic characteristics, and health system factors. Subgroup analyses by sex, facility ownership, urbanicity, and region were also performed.

Results:

Hemodialysis was provided in 75.6% of claims. Subsidized members funded by the national budget (PBI APBN) had significantly lower odds of receiving hemodialysis compared to informal workers (PBPU) and members subsidized by local budgets (PBI APBD), with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of 1.56 and 1.31, respectively. Disparities were more pronounced in rural areas, where PBI APBD members had higher odds (AOR 2.40) than their PBI APBN counterparts. Patients in private facilities (AOR 1.30) and urban areas had better access, while regional disparities favored developed regions like Java/Bali.

Conclusions:

Addressing systemic inequities in Indonesia’s health system is critical to improving hemodialysis access and advancing universal health coverage.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Munandar A, Hasibuan SR, Kusuma D

Differences in Hemodialysis Claim Patterns Across Membership Types Among Patients With Renal Failure Based on National Health Insurance Data From 2017 to 2022: Cross-Sectional Analysis

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e73731

DOI: 10.2196/73731

PMID: 41183316

PMCID: 12624297

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.