Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Mar 3, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 6, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Designing Digital Mental Health Tools to Support the Needs of Black Adults in the United States: Qualitative Analysis

Popowski SA, Meyerhoff J, Allen OM, Nguyen T, McCall T, Pederson A, Reddy M, Mohr D, Kornfield R

Designing Digital Mental Health Tools to Support the Needs of Black Adults in the United States: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73279

DOI: 10.2196/73279

PMID: 41052419

PMCID: 12500225

Designing Digital Mental Health Tools to Support the Needs of Black Adults in the United States: Qualitative Analysis

  • Sarah Alexandra Popowski; 
  • Jonah Meyerhoff; 
  • Olivia Marin Allen; 
  • Theresa Nguyen; 
  • Terika McCall; 
  • Aderonke Pederson; 
  • Madhu Reddy; 
  • David Mohr; 
  • Rachel Kornfield

ABSTRACT

Background:

Depression and anxiety are associated with excess morbidity and mortality, constituting a major health care challenge. The prevalence of these conditions is increasing. In the U.S., the health-related burden of depression and anxiety may disproportionately affect Black adults, who face unique stressors impacting their mental health and barriers to accessing treatment.

Objective:

This study seeks to explore the mental health experiences of non-treatment seeking Black adults, and how these experiences relate to their needs and preferences for the design of digital mental health (DMH) tools, through user-centered design methods.

Methods:

This study included 25 non-treatment seeking Black adults (aged 18-61) with experiences of depression or anxiety to share their perspectives on how DMH tools can meet their needs. All 25 Participants engaged in an asynchronous online discussion group and completed a technology probe in which they used an automated mental health self-management text messaging tool for 18 days. A subset of participants (n=6) completed follow-up interviews to elaborate on their impressions of the program and design ideas.

Results:

Participants described how racism and mental health stigma severely limit opportunities to discuss their mental health challenges, both within and outside the Black community. They endorsed text messaging as a convenient way to introduce mental health self-management skills but advocated for the integration of content that highlights and addresses the experiences of Black individuals, creating nonjudgmental spaces for discussing mental health experiences, and linkage to formal mental health treatment for those who want it.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that it is critical to consider the role of racial discrimination and mental health stigma in shaping psychological well-being when designing inclusive and culturally sensitive DMH tools. Furthermore, DMH tools can provide non-treatment seeking Black adults with a supportive environment to address mental health concerns, which may otherwise be difficult to find due to stigma.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Popowski SA, Meyerhoff J, Allen OM, Nguyen T, McCall T, Pederson A, Reddy M, Mohr D, Kornfield R

Designing Digital Mental Health Tools to Support the Needs of Black Adults in the United States: Qualitative Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73279

DOI: 10.2196/73279

PMID: 41052419

PMCID: 12500225

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.