Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Feb 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 9, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Developing Clinical Decision (Support) Systems Combining the Scientific and Regulatory Perspective: European Insights on Challenges, Requirements, and Practical Guidance

Vrijlandt SE, Janssen SW, van Rossum AM, Achten NB, Oostenbrink R

Developing Clinical Decision (Support) Systems Combining the Scientific and Regulatory Perspective: European Insights on Challenges, Requirements, and Practical Guidance

JMIR Med Inform 2026;14:e72809

DOI: 10.2196/72809

Developing clinical decision (support) systems combining the scientific and regulatory perspective: European insights on challenges, requirements, and practical guidance.

  • Sanne EW Vrijlandt; 
  • Sanne WCM Janssen; 
  • Annemarie MC van Rossum; 
  • Niek B Achten; 
  • Rianne Oostenbrink

ABSTRACT

Clinical decision-making is a critical process where physicians balance risks and benefits. Clinical Decision Support Tools (CDSTs) are increasingly used to help in this process. The regulatory landscape for CDSTs is evolving significantly, with the new European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) now requiring, CE certification for certain CDSTs. This shift poses challenges for healthcare providers to develop CDSTs in an effective and useful manner while adhering to regulations. This viewpoint explores the development of CDSTs across three key phases: scientific development, regulatory assessment, and clinical implementation. Using three tools (the Early Onset Sepsis Calculator, Feverkidstool), and Neonatal Procalcitonin Intervention Study algorithm) as examples, this viewpoint illustrates the diverse challenges and solutions in developing a reliable, well integrated and practical tool for clinical use. Successful integration of CDSTs into clinical practice requires a comprehensive understanding of the interconnections between these phases. Phases must be navigated strategically, as decisions made in one phase, such as algorithm validation and platform selection in the scientific phase, influence decisions in further phases. While regulations focus on technical safety, ensuring scientific validity is critical for the long-term success of CDSTs. Developers and clinicians must rigorously validate their tools to ensure they are based on robust evidence and effective for clinical use. To achieve this, they should address the challenges outlined in this review, considering both regulation requirements and clinical needs, to create CDSTs that are not only compliant but also adaptable to the rapidly changing healthcare landscape.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Vrijlandt SE, Janssen SW, van Rossum AM, Achten NB, Oostenbrink R

Developing Clinical Decision (Support) Systems Combining the Scientific and Regulatory Perspective: European Insights on Challenges, Requirements, and Practical Guidance

JMIR Med Inform 2026;14:e72809

DOI: 10.2196/72809

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.