Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Feb 17, 2025
Date Accepted: Sep 23, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Demystifying Quality Metrics and Unveiling the True Measure of Quality of Care in Nursing Homes: Mixed Effects Analysis

Ali H, Bharadwaj S

Demystifying Quality Metrics and Unveiling the True Measure of Quality of Care in Nursing Homes: Mixed Effects Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e72770

DOI: 10.2196/72770

PMID: 41610423

PMCID: 12854662

Demystifying Quality Metrics and Unveiling the True Measure of Quality of Care in Nursing Homes

  • Haneen Ali; 
  • Suhas Bharadwaj

ABSTRACT

Background:

The regulatory framework for nursing homes has evolved significantly, with a growing emphasis on outcome-based quality indicators. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) underpins the Five-Star Quality Rating System for Nursing Homes, a widely used performance measure with both strengths and limitations.

Objective:

This study examines the validity of the Five-Star Rating System and its associated quality indicators in assessing nursing home care quality.

Methods:

We constructed a panel dataset from three primary sources: (1) COVID-19 nursing home data, (2) payroll-based journal (PBJ) data, and (3) nursing home quality measure snapshots. COVID-19 outcomes—resident and staff cases and death counts from May 2020 to June 2023—were used as dependent variables. Predictor variables included the Five-Star Rating System and its structural, process, and outcome (SPO) quality indicators. We applied hierarchical generalized linear mixed-effects modeling to assess associations between COVID-19 outcomes and SPO quality measures. The dataset comprised 15,416 nursing homes that reported at least one week of COVID-19 data at the facility level.

Results:

Staffing levels, health deficiency scores, COVID-19 hospitalizations, and vaccination rates were significantly associated with COVID-19 outcomes. However, the Five-Star Rating System, Medicaid dependency, and ownership type demonstrated no clear relationship with these outcomes.

Conclusions:

Despite its widespread use, the Five-Star Quality Rating System for Nursing Homes is an unreliable measure of care quality. Policymakers, lawmakers, and industry stakeholders must work toward refining and improving the system to ensure its reliability and effectiveness in assessing nursing home performance.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ali H, Bharadwaj S

Demystifying Quality Metrics and Unveiling the True Measure of Quality of Care in Nursing Homes: Mixed Effects Analysis

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e72770

DOI: 10.2196/72770

PMID: 41610423

PMCID: 12854662

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.