Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 12, 2025 - Apr 9, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 17, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Recruiting a very large sample of pregnant individuals for an online nationwide randomized controlled trial: A report on challenges and opportunities
ABSTRACT
Background:
It is challenging to recruit vulnerable populations such as pregnant individuals, particularly during the perinatal period which involves significant life changes and stressful situations that may create barriers to participation. Barriers to participation are even more prominent in historically marginalized populations, such as minoritized and low-income populations. Current literature is limited on recruitment methods and specific activities may be best to recruit diverse pregnant individuals into online studies for the promotion of perinatal mental health.
Objective:
The purpose of this paper is to describe recruitment methods and strategies used to recruit a large sample (N=1953) of diverse pregnant individuals to an online nationwide large-scale randomized controlled trial.
Methods:
The Mamma Mia study is a multi-site randomized controlled trial of an online- and mobile-based intervention for preventing and reducing perinatal depressive symptoms, based in the United States. The study intended to ensure a diverse national representation in the study population, with internal team demographic goals of at least 50% of participants who identified as non-White and at least 25% low-income (as defined as a household income of less than $50,000). IRB-approved active and passive recruitment methods, both online nationally and in-person locally, were used to recruit eligible pregnant individuals.
Results:
Combining local and in-person with national and online recruitment methods allowed for successful recruitment of a large and diverse sample of pregnant individuals, despite the necessity for several pivots due to national events (e.g., pandemic). Additionally, this layered approach allowed the study to continue during an unplanned world event and be responsive to pivoting to meet recruitment goals. Recruitment approaches and methods that were the most successful were establishing community partnerships both online nationally and in-person locally, dedicated research time to focus on recruiting historically marginalized groups for a more representative sample, allocation of study time and resources to recruitment preparation, and dedicated internal research team recruitment planning and tracking.
Conclusions:
Researchers should continue to publish and disseminate specific details about recruitment efforts and results, highlighting both aspects of success and lessons learned, as well as the pivot points in their recruitment methods for shared learning. Clinical Trial: Clinical Trials: HM20017197
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.