Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Feb 11, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 11, 2025 - Feb 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 14, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Authors’ Reply: The Importance of Comparing New Technologies (AI) to Existing Tools for Patient Education on Common Dermatologic Conditions: A Commentary

Chau C, Feng H, Cobos G, Park J

Authors’ Reply: The Importance of Comparing New Technologies (AI) to Existing Tools for Patient Education on Common Dermatologic Conditions: A Commentary

JMIR Dermatol 2025;8:e72540

DOI: 10.2196/72540

PMID: 40168678

PMCID: 11978276

Authors’ Response: Comment on "The Comparative Sufficiency of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI in Answering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis Questions About Common Dermatological Diagnoses, Response"

  • Courtney Chau; 
  • Hao Feng; 
  • Gabriela Cobos; 
  • Joyce Park

ABSTRACT

N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chau C, Feng H, Cobos G, Park J

Authors’ Reply: The Importance of Comparing New Technologies (AI) to Existing Tools for Patient Education on Common Dermatologic Conditions: A Commentary

JMIR Dermatol 2025;8:e72540

DOI: 10.2196/72540

PMID: 40168678

PMCID: 11978276

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.