Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Feb 3, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 9, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessing the Effects of eHealth Literacy and the Area Deprivation Index on Barriers to Electronic Patient Portal Use for Orthopedic Surgery: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Litvak AL, Lin N, Hynes K, Strelzow J, Stepan JG

Assessing the Effects of eHealth Literacy and the Area Deprivation Index on Barriers to Electronic Patient Portal Use for Orthopedic Surgery: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

JMIR Perioper Med 2026;9:e72035

DOI: 10.2196/72035

PMID: 41499696

PMCID: 12779103

Assessing The Effects of eHealth Literacy (eHEALS) and Area Deprivation Index on Barriers to Electronic Patient Portal Use Within Orthopaedic Surgery: A Cross-sectional Observational Study

  • Audrey Lynn Litvak; 
  • Nicholas Lin; 
  • Kelly Hynes; 
  • Jason Strelzow; 
  • Jeffrey G Stepan

ABSTRACT

Background:

As EPPs continue to gain popularity and systems transition to online tools for scheduling, communication, and telehealth, patients without access or skills to utilize these tools may be overlooked.

Objective:

This study analyzed patient-level and neighborhood-level factors, including eHealth literacy level and Area Deprivation Index (ADI), that may limit electronic patient portal (EPP) access within orthopaedic surgery.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey-based study was performed at a single urban, tertiary academic medical center in the United States. Survey responses (n=287) collected sociodemographic characteristics, the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), and ADI, which is an address-generated national census measure of neighborhood disadvantage. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported barriers to EPP access/use. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were performed.

Results:

Forty-three percent of patients (n=124/287) self-reported barriers to EPP access. Reported barriers related to physical access (10%), technology discomfort (44%), and preference (63%). In the adjusted regressions, only low eHealth literacy and older age predicted any barriers to EPP use (p<0.001), including barriers of technology discomfort (p<0.001) and preference (low eHealth p<0.001; older age p=0.01). Patients with physical access-related barriers as opposed to technology discomfort or preference barriers had the lowest eHealth scores (17.0 vs. 27.0 vs. 27.0) and roughly a quartile higher ADI (73.0 vs. 53.5 vs. 58.0).

Conclusions:

Fewer physical access-related barriers were expressed compared to barriers of technology discomfort or preference and low eHealth literacy predicted patient-reported barriers to EPP use. Point of care screening with eHEALS may identify patients who require follow-up outside of the EPP during critical perioperative periods. Patient preference for EPP versus non-EPP communications should also be documented.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Litvak AL, Lin N, Hynes K, Strelzow J, Stepan JG

Assessing the Effects of eHealth Literacy and the Area Deprivation Index on Barriers to Electronic Patient Portal Use for Orthopedic Surgery: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

JMIR Perioper Med 2026;9:e72035

DOI: 10.2196/72035

PMID: 41499696

PMCID: 12779103

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.