Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jan 24, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 10, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Additional Investigations and Referrals by Primary Care Physicians in Uncertain Clinical Situations: Cross-Sectional Study Using Virtual Patient–Based Scenarios

Lorenzo M, Pelaccia T, Triby E, Can Y, Krider R, Maisonneuve H, Fernandez N

Additional Investigations and Referrals by Primary Care Physicians in Uncertain Clinical Situations: Cross-Sectional Study Using Virtual Patient–Based Scenarios

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e71717

DOI: 10.2196/71717

PMID: 41911436

Additional Investigations and Referrals by Primary Care Physicians in Uncertain Clinical Situations: Virtual Patient–Based Cross-Sectional Study

  • Mathieu Lorenzo; 
  • Thierry Pelaccia; 
  • Emmanuel Triby; 
  • Yunus Can; 
  • Romain Krider; 
  • Hubert Maisonneuve; 
  • Nicolas Fernandez

ABSTRACT

Background:

In primary care, approximately 20% of consultations occur in uncertain situations, prompting physicians to request additional investigations or referrals (AIR) to aid decision-making. While optimal management of AIR is crucial for cost-effectiveness and patient safety, younger practitioners are often criticized for overusing AIR. Experience and other factors such as anxiety, practice conditions or societal pressures have been linked to AIR usage. However, no study has explored these relationships under standardized conditions.

Objective:

To examine the association between experience and AIR requests in uncertain situations using standardized virtual patient simulations.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 40 primary care physicians (PCPs) stratified by sex and experience (<10 vs. ≥10 years). Participants engaged in a simulated clinical scenario involving a 69-year-old man with atypical dyspnea, designed to evoke diagnostic uncertainty. Participants’ number of years of experience, sex, age, place of practice, type of practice, number of in-office patients, duration of consultations, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) and Physician Reaction to Uncertainty (PRU) scores and diagnostic hypotheses were collected and analyzed using multivariate regression models.

Results:

The group with under 10 years of experience had higher STAI-Y and PRU scores (respectively 41.3 vs 32.7; P=<.001 and 20.7 vs 14.4; P =.002). Participants with under 10 years of professional experience ordered less AIR on average: 10.2 (SD 3.4; 95%CI [8.9 - 11.7]) vs 8.1 (SD 3.7; 95%CI [6.5 - 9.9]; P=.03). There was no effect in costs: €153.8 versus €129.6 (P=.03; effect size 0.296 [-0.348; 0.939]). There was no effect of experience in multivariate analysis

Conclusions:

Contrary to prior assumptions, younger PCPs do not overly rely on AIR in uncertain situations, suggesting that clinical reasoning skills remain robust. Future research should explore interventions to reduce anxiety and enhance tolerance to uncertainty.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lorenzo M, Pelaccia T, Triby E, Can Y, Krider R, Maisonneuve H, Fernandez N

Additional Investigations and Referrals by Primary Care Physicians in Uncertain Clinical Situations: Cross-Sectional Study Using Virtual Patient–Based Scenarios

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e71717

DOI: 10.2196/71717

PMID: 41911436

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.