Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 24, 2025 - Mar 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 26, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Benchmarking Environmental Health Influences on Food Security in Very Remote Indigenous Communities in Australia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Stoneham M, Hendry M, Mackenzie S, Pollard CM

Benchmarking Environmental Health Influences on Food Security in Very Remote Indigenous Communities in Australia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e71697

DOI: 10.2196/71697

PMID: 41442704

PMCID: 12780706

Benchmarking environmental health influences on food security in very remote Indigenous communities in Australia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

  • Melissa Stoneham; 
  • Miranda Hendry; 
  • Scott Mackenzie; 
  • Christina Mary Pollard

ABSTRACT

Background:

Many factors including the impact of colonization and subsequent intergenerational trauma contribute to inequalities in health outcomes for Australian Indigenous peoples. The unacceptable health gap is particularly high for Indigenous Australians living in very remote communities. Food insecurity, defined as a lack of regular access to safe, nutritious and affordable food, is influenced by both housing and retail environments. Ensuring houses have functional and adequately maintained kitchens and access to affordable healthy food are significant policy challenges for the Australian Government, yet little remains known about these environmental health drivers in remote areas.

Objective:

This study aims to benchmark environmental health food security risk factors impacting in 19 very remote Indigenous communities in Western Australia by auditing the appropriateness and suitability of kitchens in houses (internal environment); assessing food affordability and retail practices (external environment) and residents’ concerns and perceptions of appropriate kitchens.

Methods:

The mixed methods ehealth protocol includes three methodological approaches to audit and benchmark environmental health risk factors and perceptions in houses and community stores. The internal environment is assessed via an in-house audit of facilities used to prepare, store and cook food to maintain Healthy Living Principle 4 using a customized digital App and a 5-minute face-to-face yarn (interview) with (n=130) tenants. This provides a lived experience perspective to inform recommendations for housing and store pricing policy. The external environment assessment of retail practices and prices of (n=97) food items and (n=25) sanitation products at remote community stores will be undertaken using the mobile phone Healthy Diet ASAP App and comparing the mean price of each product and the whole diet with grocery stores in the nearest town and the major capital city. Descriptive statistics and frequencies will be reported for the audits and thematic analysis of the interviews will be undertaken.

Results:

The tenant interviews and data collection for the in-house and retail audits across the 19 communities will be undertaken by November 2025 and analysis is expected to be completed by March 2026. Findings will be collated and triangulated to provide benchmark data for environmental health determinants of food security in very remote Western Australian communities. Preliminary findings will be shared with each community in formats to support and inform policy and practices regarding timely maintenance of remote homes, kitchen design suitability, and community store retail practices.

Conclusions:

his is the first study in Australia to explore the environmental health drivers of food insecurity in very remote Indigenous communities using digital technology from the perspectives of the tenant, in-house facilities and in-store retail practices. This food security environmental health benchmarking will provide evidence for advocacy to promote culturally appropriate and practical solutions to improve living conditions and health of families in very remote areas.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Stoneham M, Hendry M, Mackenzie S, Pollard CM

Benchmarking Environmental Health Influences on Food Security in Very Remote Indigenous Communities in Australia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e71697

DOI: 10.2196/71697

PMID: 41442704

PMCID: 12780706

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.