Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 20, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The User Experience of Ambulatory Assessment and Mood Monitoring in Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

Astill Wright L, Majid M, Moore M, Momoh G, Patil R, Shajan G, Purewal D, Patel S, Morriss R

The User Experience of Ambulatory Assessment and Mood Monitoring in Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71525

DOI: 10.2196/71525

PMID: 41105870

PMCID: 12533931

The user experience of ecological momentary assessment and mood monitoring in Bipolar Disorder: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

  • Laurence Astill Wright; 
  • Madiha Majid; 
  • Matthew Moore; 
  • Goldie Momoh; 
  • Renee Patil; 
  • Georgina Shajan; 
  • Daljit Purewal; 
  • Shireen Patel; 
  • Richard Morriss

ABSTRACT

Background:

The perspectives and preferences of individuals with Bipolar Disorder (BD) will likely be crucial for the success of mood monitoring interventions, or for Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) as a method of data collection. This research has not previously been synthesised.

Objective:

This systematic review and meta-synthesis aimed to assess the user experience of mood monitoring and ecological momentary assessment procedures. This included: barriers and facilitators to use (for people with BD and for clinicians) and intended purpose.

Methods:

Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of participant, user and clinician experiences of mood monitoring and EMA for BD. We searched 8 electronic databases and included mixed-methods studies. Studies were rated for risk of bias in qualitative studies.

Results:

20 studies were identified. We identified 9 overarching concepts: adverse effects, barriers to mood monitoring, facilitators to mood monitoring, purpose of mood monitoring, sharing with others (negative), sharing with others (positive), clinician barriers/concerns, clinician facilitators/suggestions, desired features.

Conclusions:

We report key concepts that are likely to improve the user experience, engagement, attrition, usability and acceptability of EMA/mood monitoring protocols for people with BD. Fundamentally users wished to retain control over their data with a high degree of emphasis on customisability and personalisation.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Astill Wright L, Majid M, Moore M, Momoh G, Patil R, Shajan G, Purewal D, Patel S, Morriss R

The User Experience of Ambulatory Assessment and Mood Monitoring in Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71525

DOI: 10.2196/71525

PMID: 41105870

PMCID: 12533931

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.