Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: May 8, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 2, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Investigating the Impact of Lived Experience Stories on Self-Harm, Mood, and Help-Seeking Intentions: Web-Based Between-Participants Experimental Study in Individuals With Recent Self-Harm

Ferrar J, Winstone L, Penton-Voak I, Biddle L, Moran P, Grace L, Mars B

Investigating the Impact of Lived Experience Stories on Self-Harm, Mood, and Help-Seeking Intentions: Web-Based Between-Participants Experimental Study in Individuals With Recent Self-Harm

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e71280

DOI: 10.2196/71280

PMID: 41780917

Investigating the impact of lived experience stories on self-harm, mood, and help-seeking intentions: a web-based between-subjects experimental study in individuals with recent self-harm

  • Jennifer Ferrar; 
  • Lizzy Winstone; 
  • Ian Penton-Voak; 
  • Lucy Biddle; 
  • Paul Moran; 
  • Lydia Grace; 
  • Becky Mars

ABSTRACT

Background:

Lived experience stories are often used on formal help sites as a support resource for individuals who self-harm. While self-harm related internet use provides an alternative for individuals who are not yet ready or are unwilling or unable to access support offline, it has also been shown to unintentionally reinforce self-harm behaviour. There are several components which might influence whether a lived experience story is perceived as helpful, unhelpful, or potentially harmful, and the evidence supporting that these encourage help-seeking in the reader is limited.

Objective:

The present study is the quantitative component of a mixed-methods project which aimed to investigate how variations in help-seeking messages contained within online lived experience stories are interpreted by and psychologically impact those with a history of self-harm.

Methods:

In an online experiment, individuals with a recent history of self-harm, were randomised to read stories that either mentioned: i) self-help strategies, ii) seeking help from informal and formal sources, or iii) did not mention help-seeking. Help-seeking intentions, mood, entrapment, and expectations of future self-harm was measured, and participants provided feedback on the stories.

Results:

There was limited evidence for an effect of story type on future help-seeking intentions and stronger evidence for an effect of story type on negative affect. Participants in the “Self-help” condition reported lower negative affect after reading the stories compared to participants in the “No help” condition (Mean difference = -3.97, 95% CI -7.72 to -0.22, p = .04) and the “Informal/formal” help condition (Mean difference = -3.70, 95% CI -7.55 to 0.14, p =.06). A key criticism of the stories was that they were unrelatable, but this sentiment was less prevalent among those in the “No help” condition. Key positives were that the stories included a realistic but hopeful outlook of recovery (less prevalent in the “Informal/formal help” condition) and were supportive (less prevalent in the “No help” condition).

Conclusions:

While the inclusion of self-help strategies in a lived experience story reduced its impact on negative affect, the inclusion of self-help strategies or seeking help from others did not encourage future help-seeking intentions. Making stories relatable, authentic, and providing multiple strategies for support might be key to encourage help-seeking, but more research is needed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ferrar J, Winstone L, Penton-Voak I, Biddle L, Moran P, Grace L, Mars B

Investigating the Impact of Lived Experience Stories on Self-Harm, Mood, and Help-Seeking Intentions: Web-Based Between-Participants Experimental Study in Individuals With Recent Self-Harm

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e71280

DOI: 10.2196/71280

PMID: 41780917

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.